Literature DB >> 25099284

Surfing for suicide methods and help: content analysis of websites retrieved with search engines in Austria and the United States.

Benedikt Till1, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Internet provides a variety of resources for individuals searching for suicide-related information. Structured content-analytic approaches to assess intercultural differences in web contents retrieved with method-related and help-related searches are scarce.
METHOD: We used the 2 most popular search engines (Google and Yahoo/Bing) to retrieve US-American and Austrian search results for the term suicide, method-related search terms (e.g., suicide methods, how to kill yourself, painless suicide, how to hang yourself), and help-related terms (e.g., suicidal thoughts, suicide help) on February 11, 2013. In total, 396 websites retrieved with US search engines and 335 websites from Austrian searches were analyzed with content analysis on the basis of current media guidelines for suicide reporting. We assessed the quality of websites and compared findings across search terms and between the United States and Austria.
RESULTS: In both countries, protective outweighed harmful website characteristics by approximately 2:1. Websites retrieved with method-related search terms (e.g., how to hang yourself) contained more harmful (United States: P < .001, Austria: P < .05) and fewer protective characteristics (United States: P < .001, Austria: P < .001) compared to the term suicide. Help-related search terms (e.g., suicidal thoughts) yielded more websites with protective characteristics (United States: P = .07, Austria: P < .01). Websites retrieved with U.S. search engines generally had more protective characteristics (P < .001) than searches with Austrian search engines. Resources with harmful characteristics were better ranked than those with protective characteristics (United States: P < .01, Austria: P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of suicide-related websites obtained depends on the search terms used. Preventive efforts to improve the ranking of preventive web content, particularly regarding method-related search terms, seem necessary. © Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25099284     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.13m08861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  8 in total

1.  How much self-poisoning attempts are visible in Iran?

Authors:  Mehdi Moradinazar; Farid Najafi; Mohammad Reza Baneshi; Ali Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2018-07-02

2.  Low validity of Google Trends for behavioral forecasting of national suicide rates.

Authors:  Ulrich S Tran; Rita Andel; Thomas Niederkrotenthaler; Benedikt Till; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Martin Voracek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Using the internet for suicide-related purposes: Contrasting findings from young people in the community and self-harm patients admitted to hospital.

Authors:  Lucy Biddle; Jane Derges; Carlie Goldsmith; Jenny L Donovan; David Gunnell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The perceived impact of suicide-related internet use: A survey of young Australians who have gone online for suicide-related reasons.

Authors:  Katherine Mok; Anthony F Jorm; Jane Pirkis
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2016-02-09

5.  Googling for Suicide-Content and Quality Analysis of Suicide-Related Websites: Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Andrea Boggero; Giovanni Del Puente; Martina Olcese; Davide Prestia; Haitham Jahrami; Nasr Chalghaf; Noomen Guelmami; Fairouz Azaiez; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Exposure to, and searching for, information about suicide and self-harm on the Internet: Prevalence and predictors in a population based cohort of young adults.

Authors:  Becky Mars; Jon Heron; Lucy Biddle; Jenny L Donovan; Rachel Holley; Martyn Piper; John Potokar; Clare Wyllie; David Gunnell
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Association between suicide reporting in the media and suicide: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Niederkrotenthaler; Marlies Braun; Jane Pirkis; Benedikt Till; Steven Stack; Mark Sinyor; Ulrich S Tran; Martin Voracek; Qijin Cheng; Florian Arendt; Sebastian Scherr; Paul S F Yip; Matthew J Spittal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-18

8.  The quality of online media reporting of celebrity suicide in India and its association with subsequent online suicide-related search behaviour among general population: An infodemiology study.

Authors:  Ragul Ganesh; Swarndeep Singh; Rajan Mishra; Rajesh Sagar
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-08-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.