Literature DB >> 25098999

Abrasion resistance of direct and indirect resins as a function of a sealant veneer.

Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele, Daniel Maranha Rocha, Maria Amelia Màximo Araujo, Màrcia Carneiro Valera, Susana MarIa Salazar Marocho1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abrasive wear is one of the most common type of wear that not only affect teeth, as also dental restorations. Thus to investigate one of the etiological factors as tooth brushing procedure is clinical relevant in order to select the best material combination that may prevent damage of resin dental restoration's abrasion. AIMS: This study evaluated the influence of tooth brushing on mass loss and surface roughness of direct Venus (Vs) and indirect Signum (Sg) resin composites, with and without a surface sealant, Fortify (F).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four specimens were prepared with each resin composite, using their proprietary curing units, according to manufacturer's instructions. All the specimens were polished and ultrasonically cleaned in distilled water for 5 minutes. Half of the specimens of each resin (n = 12) were covered with F (Vs F and Sg F ), except for the control (C) specimens (Vs C and Sg C ), which were not sealed. Mass loss (ML) as well as surface roughness (Ra ) was measured for all the specimens. Then, the specimens were subjected to toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion, using a testing machine for 67.000 brushing strokes, in an abrasive slurry. After brushing simulation, the specimens were removed from the holder, rinsed thoroughly and blot dried with soft absorbent paper. The abrasion of the material was quantitatively determined with final measurements of ML and surface roughness, using the method described above.
RESULTS: ML data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the analysis indicated that resin composites were not statistically different; however, the specimens sealed with F showed higher ML. Ra mean values of the groups Vs F and Sg F significantly increased.
CONCLUSION: Tooth brushing affects mainly the roughness of the direct and indirect resin composites veneered with a sealant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098999     DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.138345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Dent Res        ISSN: 0970-9290


  2 in total

1.  Color difference of composite resins after cementation with different shades of resin luting cement.

Authors:  Esra Cengiz; Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz; Izgen Karakaya; Huseyin Aktore
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Effect of mouthwashes on the integrity of composite resin and resin modified glass ionomer: In vitro study.

Authors:  Ana Armas-Vega; Paola Casanova-Obando; María-Fernanda Taboada-Alvear; Jonathan-Eduardo Aldas-Ramírez; Nadia Montero-Oleas; Andrés Viteri-García
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-02-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.