Literature DB >> 25098591

Clinical presentation of intralabyrinthine schwannomas: a multicenter study of 110 cases.

Xavier Dubernard1, Thomas Somers, Konstantinos Veros, Christophe Vincent, Valérie Franco-Vidal, Olivier Deguine, Philippe Bordure, Thomas Linder, Emmanuel Lescanne, Denis Ayache, Michel Mondain, Sébastien Schmerber, Myriam Dahmani-Causse, Eric Truy, Vincent Darrouzet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the presentation of intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs). STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective multicenter study involving 12 European skull base surgery tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: One hundred ten patients with the diagnosis of ILS, either labyrinth confined or extending into the internal auditory meatus for less than 50% of their volume. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data collected were age, sex, nature and timing of presenting symptoms, hearing (according to the AAO-HNS grading system), results of vestibular tests (caloric tests and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials [c-VEMPs]), and tumor localization. Presenting symptoms and laboratory test results were studied according to the extension of the lesion into the cochlea (C) and vestibule (V), on one hand, and according to unifocal (L1) or plurifocal (L2) extension into the labyrinth, on the other.
RESULTS: Intracochlear type was more common (50%) than vestibular (19.1%) and more diffuse forms (30.9%). The mean delay for diagnosis was long (72.5 mo; SD, 76.6). Mean age was 53.9 years (SD, 13.2). Deafness was the most common symptom (77.8 dB HL [SD, 33.6], with only 24.6% of patients keeping viable hearing. Caloric tests (65.5% of patients) were abnormal in 77.8% of cases. c-VEMPs were abnormal in 65.7% of the 36 cases analyzed. In V forms, hearing was significantly better (class A + B in 21.1% in C and 45.8% in V forms) (p = 0.03), and vestibular function was more altered (C: 57%, V: 100%, p = 0.0009*). L2 forms were diagnosed later (L1: 59.1 mo, L2: 104.5 mo; p = 0.004*) and were associated more frequently with a dead ear (L1: 13.1%, L2: 41.2%, p = 0.002*) than L1 forms.
CONCLUSIONS: This series, which is the largest in the literature, demonstrates that even very small and localized ILSs heavily compromise labyrinthine functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098591     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas: Disease Presentation, Tumor Management, and Hearing Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Matthew L Carlson; Daniel Jethanamest
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Intracochlear schwannoma : Tumor removal via subtotal cochleoectomy and partial cochlear reconstruction with preservation of semicircular canal function.

Authors:  S K Plontke; S Kösling; N Pazaitis; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Intralabyrinthine schwannomas : Surgical management and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants. German version].

Authors:  S K Plontke; T Rahne; M Pfister; G Götze; C Heider; N Pazaitis; C Strauss; P Caye-Thomasen; S Kösling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Intracochlear schwannoma : Tumor removal via subtotal cochleoectomy and partial cochlear reconstruction with preservation of semicircular canal function. German version].

Authors:  S Plontke; S Kösling; N Pazaitis; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Bilateral intracochlear schwannomas in a patient with no genetic or clinical features of neurofibromatosis type 2.

Authors:  S Withers; S K Plontke; R Boeddinghaus; J Kuthubutheen; M Atlas
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes in patients with intralabyrinthine schwannomas: conservative management vs. microsurgery.

Authors:  Émilie Gosselin; Anastasios Maniakas; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Clinical comparison of two subtypes of cystic vestibular schwannoma: surgical considerations and outcomes.

Authors:  Zirong Huo; Zhihua Zhang; Qi Huang; Jun Yang; Zhaoyan Wang; Huan Jia; Hao Wu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Cochleo-facial corridor to the vestibule and fundus of the internal auditory canal through oval window: a minimal invasive and cochlea sparing approach.

Authors:  Derya Ümit Talas; Orhan Beger; Yusuf Vayisoğlu; Vural Hamzaoğlu; Hakan Özalp; Salim Çakır; Ahmet Dağtekin; Celal Bağdatoğlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Histopathologic Evaluation of Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma.

Authors:  Michael Bagattini; Alicia M Quesnel; Christof Röösli
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Intralabyrinthine schwannomas : Surgical management and hearing rehabilitation with cochlear implants.

Authors:  S K Plontke; T Rahne; M Pfister; G Götze; C Heider; N Pazaitis; C Strauss; P Caye-Thomasen; S Kösling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.