Literature DB >> 25098567

[Newly developed modular reverse fracture endoprosthesis in non-reconstructable humeral head fracture in old people].

F Reuther1, G Kohut, S Nijs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Primary endoprosthetic joint replacement in non-reconstructable proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Alternative to fracture hemi-endoprosthesis with resorption of tuberosities and secondary rotator cuff insuffiency which leads to unsatisfying functional results. INDICATIONS: Non-reconstructable proximal humeral fracture in mainly old patients with osteoporotic bone, multifragment tuberosity fracture and degenerative rotator cuff lesion. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Patient not fit for surgery, pre-existing shoulder infection or sepsis, severe general medical condition, nerve damage (axillay nerve, Plexus) SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Deltopectoral or delta-split approach. Removal of head fragments. Reinforcement of tuberosities and exposure of glenoid. Implantation of the metaglene and fixation of glenosphere after removal of labrum and capsule. Reaming of humeral shaft and cementing of the prosthesis stem. The retroversion and height of the reverse central part then can be adjusted freely. The tuberosities can be fixed with suture at the middle part. With a titanium cable an additional compression osteosynthesis of the tuberosities can be done by direct pressing on the osseoinductive coated central part. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Positioning of the arm on an abduction pillow for 4 weeks, then active exercise treatment until week 6. Free movement exercise under guidance for 6 months.
RESULTS: Multicentre study with 43 patients (40 women, 3 men), average age 79.8 years (range 66.9-95.8 years), 36 patients with 4-part-fracture according to Neer classification. To date, follow-up of 24 patients after at least 24 months, 9 patients lost to follow-up. Mean Constant Score 65.5 points, age and gender corrected Constant Score 96.7 %. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain 1.9. VAS for subjective satisfaction 7.5. Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES) 72.8 points. Mean active range of motion: flexion 142.3°, abduction 135.9°, external rotation 18.6°, internal rotation 47°, the radiological evaluation so far did not show any signs of scapular notching. COMPLICATIONS: One dislocated acromion fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098567     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-013-0250-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  8 in total

Review 1.  Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Miguel Pinedo; Jason Old; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Ryan W Simovitch; Matthias A Zumstein; Eveline Lohri; Naeder Helmy; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Wear-induced loss of mass in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty with conventional and inverted bearing materials.

Authors:  Georges Kohut; Frank Dallmann; Ulrich Irlenbusch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.

Authors:  R R Richards; K N An; L U Bigliani; R J Friedman; G M Gartsman; A G Gristina; J P Iannotti; V C Mow; J A Sidles; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly.

Authors:  J F Cazeneuve; D-J Cristofari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-04

6.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Long term functional outcome following reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly.

Authors:  J-F Cazeneuve; D-J Cristofari
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.256

8.  Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  R Hertel; A Hempfing; M Stiehler; M Leunig
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The bicipital groove as a landmark for reconstruction of complex proximal humeral fractures with hybrid double plate osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Jan Theopold; Bastian Marquaß; Johannes Fakler; Hanno Steinke; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  A Critical Review on Prosthetic Features Available for Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Alexander Van Tongel; Lieven De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.