Literature DB >> 25098437

The current and potential capacity for cardiac rehabilitation utilization in the United States.

Quinn R Pack1, Ray W Squires, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Steven W Lichtman, Juan P Rodriguez-Escudero, Victoria N Zysek, Randal J Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prior studies suggest that program capacity restraints may be an important reason for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) underutilization. We sought to measure current CR capacity and growth potential.
METHODS: We surveyed all CR program directors listed in the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) database in November 2012. Respondents reported current enrollment levels, program capacity, expansion potential, and obstacles to growth.
RESULTS: Of the 812 program directors in the AACVPR database, 290 (36%) completed the full survey. Respondents represented somewhat larger programs than nonrespondents but were otherwise representative of all registered AACVPR programs. Current enrollment, estimated capacity, and estimated expansion capacity were reported at a median (interquartile range) of 140 (75, 232), 192 (100, 300), and 240 (141, 380) patients annually, respectively. Using these data, we estimated that, in the year 2012, national CR utilization was 28% (min, max: 20, 38) of eligible patients. Even with modest expansion of all existing programs operating at capacity, a maximum of 47% (min, max: 32, 67) of qualifying patients in the United States could be serviced by existing CR programs. Obstacles to increasing patient participation were primarily controllable system-related problems such as facility restraints and staffing needs.
CONCLUSIONS: Even with substantial expansion of all existing CR programs, there is currently insufficient capacity to meet national service needs. This limit probably contributes to CR underutilization and has important policy implications. Solutions to this problem will likely include the creation of new CR programs, improved CR reimbursement strategies, and new models of CR delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098437     DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev        ISSN: 1932-7501            Impact factor:   2.081


  17 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Established Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: New Directions in the Era of Value-Based Healthcare.

Authors:  Karen Aspry; Wen-Chih Wu; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Anxiety and Fear of Exercise in Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation: PATIENT AND PRACTITIONER PERSPECTIVES.

Authors:  Samantha G Farris; Ana M Abrantes; Dale S Bond; Loren M Stabile; Wen-Chih Wu
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 3.  Increasing Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation From 20% to 70%: A Road Map From the Million Hearts Cardiac Rehabilitation Collaborative.

Authors:  Philip A Ades; Steven J Keteyian; Janet S Wright; Larry F Hamm; Karen Lui; Kimberly Newlin; Donald S Shepard; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Tracking Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation and Completion Among Medicare Beneficiaries to Inform the Efforts of a National Initiative.

Authors:  Matthew D Ritchey; Sha Maresh; Jessica McNeely; Thomas Shaffer; Sandra L Jackson; Steven J Keteyian; Clinton A Brawner; Mary A Whooley; Tiffany Chang; Haley Stolp; Linda Schieb; Janet Wright
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-14

Review 5.  Improving Medication Adherence in Cardiometabolic Disease: Practical and Regulatory Implications.

Authors:  Keith C Ferdinand; Fortunato Fred Senatore; Helene Clayton-Jeter; Dennis R Cryer; John C Lewin; Samar A Nasser; Mona Fiuzat; Robert M Califf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Decision Aids for Determining Facility Versus Non-Facility-Based Exercise in Those with Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jonathan K Ehrman; Derek Salisbury; Diane Treat-Jacobson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  Participation Rates, Process Monitoring, and Quality Improvement Among Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in the United States: A NATIONAL SURVEY.

Authors:  Quinn R Pack; Ray W Squires; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Steven W Lichtman; Juan P Rodriguez-Escudero; Peter K Lindenauer; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 8.  Cardiac Rehabilitation: Under-Utilized Globally.

Authors:  Sherry L Grace; Kornelia Kotseva; Mary A Whooley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Hospital effects drive variation in access to inpatient rehabilitation after trauma.

Authors:  Alisha Lussiez; John R Montgomery; Naveen F Sangji; Zhaohui Fan; Bryant W Oliphant; Mark R Hemmila; Justin B Dimick; John W Scott
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.697

10.  MI-PACE Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program for Heart Attack Survivors: Usability Study.

Authors:  Eric Y Ding; Nathaniel Erskine; Wim Stut; David D McManus; Amy Peterson; Ziyue Wang; Jorge Escobar Valle; Daniella Albuquerque; Alvaro Alonso; Naomi F Botkin; Quinn R Pack; David D McManus
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.