Literature DB >> 25098378

Climate change and species interactions: ways forward.

Amy L Angert1, Shannon L LaDeau, Richard S Ostfeld.   

Abstract

With ongoing and rapid climate change, ecologists are being challenged to predict how individual species will change in abundance and distribution, how biotic communities will change in structure and function, and the consequences of these climate-induced changes for ecosystem functioning. It is now well documented that indirect effects of climate change on species abundances and distributions, via climatic effects on interspecific interactions, can outweigh and even reverse the direct effects of climate. However, a clear framework for incorporating species interactions into projections of biological change remains elusive. To move forward, we suggest three priorities for the research community: (1) utilize tractable study systems as case studies to illustrate possible outcomes, test processes highlighted by theory, and feed back into modeling efforts; (2) develop a robust analytical framework that allows for better cross-scale linkages; and (3) determine over what time scales and for which systems prediction of biological responses to climate change is a useful and feasible goal. We end with a list of research questions that can guide future research to help understand, and hopefully mitigate, the negative effects of climate change on biota and the ecosystem services they provide.
© 2013 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biota; climate change; ecology; ecosystems; species

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25098378     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  8 in total

1.  Chronic dryness and wetness and especially pulsed drought threaten a generalist arthropod herbivore.

Authors:  Bibishan Rai; Alexandra Maria Klein; Julia Walter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Plant adaptation to climate change - Where are we?

Authors:  Jill Anderson; Bao-Hua Song
Journal:  J Syst Evol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Direct effects dominate responses to climate perturbations in grassland plant communities.

Authors:  Chengjin Chu; Andrew R Kleinhesselink; Kris M Havstad; Mitchel P McClaran; Debra P Peters; Lance T Vermeire; Haiyan Wei; Peter B Adler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Climatic warming destabilizes forest ant communities.

Authors:  Sarah E Diamond; Lauren M Nichols; Shannon L Pelini; Clint A Penick; Grace W Barber; Sara Helms Cahan; Robert R Dunn; Aaron M Ellison; Nathan J Sanders; Nicholas J Gotelli
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Different responses of alpine plants to nitrogen addition: effects on plant-plant interactions.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Peng Luo; Hao Yang; Chengxiang Mou; Li Mo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Environmental oestrogens cause predation-induced population decline in a freshwater fish.

Authors:  Daniel C Rearick; Jessica Ward; Paul Venturelli; Heiko Schoenfuss
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Warming and predation risk only weakly shape size-mediated priority effects in a cannibalistic damselfly.

Authors:  Mateusz Raczyński; Robby Stoks; Szymon Sniegula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Distribution and conservation of species is misestimated if biotic interactions are ignored: the case of the orchid Laelia speciosa.

Authors:  Mayra Flores-Tolentino; Raúl García-Valdés; Cuauhtémoc Saénz-Romero; Irene Ávila-Díaz; Horacio Paz; Leonel Lopez-Toledo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.