Literature DB >> 25098339

Sodium binding to hH3R and hH 4R--a molecular modeling study.

Hans-Joachim Wittmann1, Roland Seifert, Andrea Strasser.   

Abstract

Several aminergic GPCRs, e.g., the human histamine H3-receptor (hH3R) are sensitive to sodium ions. Based on these experimental results, including site directed mutagenesis studies, a sodium binding pocket near to the highly conserved Asp2.50 was suggested. Recently, in the crystallized adenosine A2A receptor (4EIY), a sodium ion was found in a pocket, coordinated by Asp52, Ser91, and three water molecules. Despite high homology in amino acid sequence between hH3R and hH4R, pharmacological studies revealed that the hH4R is--in contrast to hH3R--not sensitive to sodium ions. In order to obtain a deeper insight onto the differences in sodium sensitivity between hH3R and hH4R, we performed molecular modelling studies, including molecular dynamic simulations and calculation of Gibbs energy of solvation. The results of the modeling studies suggested that the amino acid at position 7.42 influences sodium binding to aminergic GPCRs in different ways. A comparison of the amino acids forming the sodium binding channel between the ligand binding pocket and the sodium binding pocket of all human aminergic GPCRs showed an 80% occurrence of glycine--in contrast to hH3R and hH4R. The Gln7.42 at hH4R disrupts a water chain, connecting the Asp3.32 of the orthosteric binding site and the Asp2.50 of the allosteric binding site. Besides, the oxygen of the glutamine side chain stabilizes the interaction of the sodium ion with the Asp3.32. Thus, the binding of the sodium into the allosteric binding site might be hindered kinetically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098339     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2394-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  40 in total

Review 1.  Target validation of G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Alan Wise; Katy Gearing; Stephen Rees
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  Species-dependent activities of G-protein-coupled receptor ligands: lessons from histamine receptor orthologs.

Authors:  Andrea Strasser; Hans-Joachim Wittmann; Armin Buschauer; Erich H Schneider; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 4.  En route to new blockbuster anti-histamines: surveying the offspring of the expanding histamine receptor family.

Authors:  Rob Leurs; Henry F Vischer; Maikel Wijtmans; Iwan J P de Esch
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 5.  The 7 TM G-protein-coupled receptor target family.

Authors:  Edgar Jacoby; Rochdi Bouhelal; Marc Gerspacher; Klaus Seuwen
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Structure of the human histamine H1 receptor complex with doxepin.

Authors:  Tatsuro Shimamura; Mitsunori Shiroishi; Simone Weyand; Hirokazu Tsujimoto; Graeme Winter; Vsevolod Katritch; Ruben Abagyan; Vadim Cherezov; Wei Liu; Gye Won Han; Takuya Kobayashi; Raymond C Stevens; So Iwata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mutation of an aspartate residue highly conserved among G-protein-coupled receptors results in nonreciprocal disruption of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor-G-protein interactions. A negative charge at amino acid residue 79 forecasts alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor sensitivity to allosteric modulation by monovalent cations and fully effective receptor/G-protein coupling.

Authors:  B P Ceresa; L E Limbird
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Metal-coupled folding of Cys2His2 zinc-finger.

Authors:  Wenfei Li; Jian Zhang; Jun Wang; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  The role of histamine H1 and H4 receptors in allergic inflammation: the search for new antihistamines.

Authors:  Robin L Thurmond; Erwin W Gelfand; Paul J Dunford
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Histamine H(4) receptor-RGS fusion proteins expressed in Sf9 insect cells: a sensitive and reliable approach for the functional characterization of histamine H(4) receptor ligands.

Authors:  Erich H Schneider; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.858

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of GPCRs by monovalent cations and anions.

Authors:  Andrea Strasser; Hans-Joachim Wittmann; Erich H Schneider; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 2.  Harnessing Ion-Binding Sites for GPCR Pharmacology.

Authors:  Barbara Zarzycka; Saheem A Zaidi; Bryan L Roth; Vsevolod Katritch
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  Pharmacological Characterization of Human Histamine Receptors and Histamine Receptor Mutants in the Sf9 Cell Expression System.

Authors:  Erich H Schneider; Roland Seifert
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2017

4.  Molecular dynamics of the histamine H3 membrane receptor reveals different mechanisms of GPCR signal transduction.

Authors:  Leonardo David Herrera-Zúñiga; Liliana Marisol Moreno-Vargas; Luck Ballaud; José Correa-Basurto; Diego Prada-Gracia; David Pastré; Patrick A Curmi; Jean Michel Arrang; Rachid C Maroun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.