Literature DB >> 25097517

Postoperative discomfort of dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.

Kenan Cantekin1, Mustafa Denizhan Yildirim2, Ebru Delikan3, Seçil Cetin4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find out postoperative discomfort in children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA).
METHODS: This study involved 78 (4 to 10 year-old) healthy patients who were scheduled for DRGA and were needed extensive dental treatment because of severe caries, and showed high dental fear and/or behavioral management problems. The children had to be fit for DRGA administration by fulfilling the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and no associated mental health or communication problems. Data were collected by structured interview either face to face (immediately post operation) or using a telephone (post operation after discharge). One of the study's investigators recorded all data related to the immediate postoperative period during the child's stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The questionnaire consisted of questions related to postoperative problems experienced by the patient in the period after their day-stay attendance. The questionnaire, consisting of questions regarding and generally related to the child's activities. In addition, pain was assessed using the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale.
RESULTS: The prevalence of postoperative problems was 46 out of 78 (59%). The mean FLACC score was 1.8 (SD=2.1). Some of the patients having more than one reported problem. Forty-one percent of the children showed nasal discomfort (P<0.01). Thirty-three percent and 43% of the children experienced throat or mouth discomfort. The most common experienced postoperative symptom after DRGA was bleeding. Nasal bleeding, however, was an uncommon complication and did not cause serious morbidity or mortality in children intubated nasotracheally. In addition, postoperative discomfort was related to number of the extractions. Children who had 4 or more extractions were more likely to experience pain. Findings associated with other bodily functions were assessed. Nausea and vomiting were reported in 20.5% of children. Twenty-six children (18%) had a fever. Thirty-nine (50.0%) parents reported that their children had problems eating.
CONCLUSION: Post-operative discomfort was more with 4 or more extraction done under DRGA and that nasal bleeding was noted a uncommon post-operative symptom.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental care for children; Dental caries; Extraction; General anesthesia

Year:  2014        PMID: 25097517      PMCID: PMC4121698     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


INTRODUCTION

In developing countries, dental caries remains one of the most prevalent health problems in children. Comprehensive dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) is a treatment option for children who require extensive dental treatment, exhibit acute situational anxiety and emotional or cognitive immaturity, or are medically compromised.[1] There are several advantages of DRGA, including safety, efficiency, convenience, and high-quality restorative and preventive (e.g., fissure sealing) dental treatment.[2] Dental practitioners usually have limited contact with parents after DRGA. It might be anticipated that the route of intubation could result in discomfort in and around the nose and throat areas. There have been very few reports published on complications after DRGA involving nasal intubation. The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative discomfort in children undergoing DRGA via oral and nasal intubation in the first 24 hours after discharge.

METHODS

The study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the Medical Faculty of Erciyes University (Turkey). The participants were a consecutive clinical convenience sample of the parents/caregivers of children receiving DRGA at Gülşah and Mert Tatar Mouth, Teeth and Jaw Surgery Hospital of Erciyes University, Turkey. DRGA was considered necessary if the child was 4–10 years old, needed extensive dental treatment because of severe caries, and showed high dental fear and/or behavioral management problems. The children had to be fit for DRGA administration by fulfilling the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II and no associated mental health or communication problems. One hundred and twelve children were initially screened for consideration of DRGA, but only 78 children were included in the study. The reasons for exclusion are given in Table-I. Carious teeth of the children were restored by traditional restorative treatment (e.g., composite, compomer, stainless steel crown, and pulp therapy), or extracted if unrestorable.
Table-I

Exclusion criteria for present study

General reasons Nasal intubation
Not ultimately willing to participate (withdrawal)Gastroesophageal reflux
Older and younger than the study’s age rangeHistory of latex allergy
Inability to connect with the caregivers/parents of the participants.History of allergy for anesthetic agents
Failure to return for follow-up.Abnormal coagulation status
Recurrent epistaxis
Nasal polyposis
Information regarding the study was given to potential participants in the form of a written covering letter / information sheet, with further verbal information provided by the same pediatric dentist (KC) if necessary. Written consent was obtained. Upon arrival in the operating room, standard monitors (including electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, and blood pressure cuff) were applied to the children. Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in oxygen, at a total fresh gas flow of 6 lt / min, via a pediatric circle circuit. When the response to verbal command was lost, intravenous access was established and nasal or oral intubation was facilitated with i.v rocuronium 0.6 mg / kg .Ventilation continued with 2% inspired sevoflurane in a 50:50% mixture of oxygen/air. At the end of the dental procedure, residual neuromuscular blockade was antagonized with atropine 0.02 mg/kg IV and neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg IV. The trachea was extubated when the patient made purposeful movements and had a regular respiratory pattern. Data were collected by structured interview either face to face (immediately post operation) or using a telephone (post operation after discharge). One of the study’s investigators recorded all data related to the immediate postoperative period during the child’s stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The questionnaire consisted of questions related to postoperative problems experienced by the patient in the period after their day-stay attendance. The questionnaire, consisting of questions regarding and generally related to the child’s activities, is shown in Table-II. In addition, pain was assessed using the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) scale (Table-III).[3]
Table-II

Post-operative complications of naso-trachealy intubated children

Complications Nasal N=78 (n/%)
Problems in eating42 (53.8)
Nose discomfort32 (41.0)
Throat discomfort26 (33.3)
Mouth discomfort34 (43.6)
Dental pain28 (35.9)
Bleeding46 (59.0)
Epistaxis10 (12.8)
Pain medication20 (25.6)
Diarrhea4 (5.1)
Constipation14 (17.9)
Nausea-vomiting16 (20.5)
Fever12 (15.4)
Table-III

The face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain assessment scale

Parameters Scores
0 1 2
Face No particular expressionor smileOccasional grimace or frown, withdrawn,disinterestedFrequent to constant quiveringchin, clenched jaw
Legs Normal position or relaxedUneasy, restless, tenseKicking or legs drawn up
Activity Lying quietly, normalposition, moves easilySquirming, shifting backand forth, tenseArched, rigid, or jerking
Cry No cry (awake or asleep)Moans or whimpers,occasional complaintCrying steadily, screams or sobs, frequent complaints
Consolability Content, relaxedReassured by occasional touching,hugging, or being talked to,distractibleDifficult to console or comfort
The FLACC pain assessment scale was the primary instrument used by PACU nurses and parents to assess the prevalence and intensity of the child’s pain in this study. The FLACC pain assessment scale incorporates five categories of pain behaviors: (1) facial expression; (2) leg movement; (3) activity; (4) crying; and (5) consolability. Each category is scored from 0 to 2, resulting in a total score between 0 and 10 (Table-III). Data management and analyses were conducted using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). Mean age and gender distribution across groups were calculated. Potential risk factors for postoperative complications were assessed using bivariate analysis and the chi-square test. A P-value < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. After identifying significant variables by bivariate analysis, these were entered into multiple logistic regression models to examine each variable, while controlling for all other confounding factors.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 41 boys (52.5%) and 37 girls (47.5%), with mean ages of 6.12±1.73 years. The mean monthly family income was US $1,286. The mean DMFT scores were 11.33±2.60. Extractions were provided for 66 (86.6%) of the children. Restorations were provided for each of 78 children (100%) with a mean of 7.24); 16 children (11.5%) had restorative treatment without any extractions being done; and no children (0%) had extractions without any restorative work being provided. Of the cases, 18% could be deemed as “short,” lasting up to 30 minutes. The majority, 62% were intermediate, lasting up to an hour, and 20% were long, lasting over an hour. Five children had procedures lasting over 90 min. Mean anesthetic time was 58±28.3 min and the mean recovery time was 16±8.1 min. The prevalence of postoperative problems was 46 out of 78 (59%) in the children, with some of the patients having more than one reported problem. Forty-one percent of the children showed nasal discomfort (P<0.01). Thirty-three percent and 43% of the children experienced throat or mouth discomfort. Fifty-one percent of children had a FLACC score greater than 0 at the time of discharge; however, 27% had a score of 3 or more. The mean FLACC scores in the children was 1.8 (SD=2.1). Observed patterns were confirmed in both the bivariate and multivariate analysis. Those children who had extractions as part of their dental rehabilitation were more likely to experience pain, as reported by FLACC scores in the PACU (P=0.01; Table-IV). There was no relationship between reported FLACC scores and gender (P=0.19).
Table-IV

Extractions and FLACC scores in each group

Extraction (N) FLACC scores
N Mean±SD CI(95%)
0220.8±0.9a0.4-0.6
1-3371.6±1.7b0.9-1.4
≥4292.3±2.6c1.1-2.1

KC: Designed the Protocol and prepared the final manuscript,MDY: Performed general anesthesia procedures,

ED: was involved in data collection, SC: was involved in data collection.

Concerning findings associated with bleeding, 59.0% of nasal intubated children were reported to exhibit this complication. Of these, 79.3% of the children witnessed bleeding from the mouth, whereas 12.8% of children had blood from the nose. Findings associated with other bodily functions were assessed. Nausea and vomiting were reported in 20.5% of children. Twenty-six children (18%) had a fever. Thirty-nine (50.0%) parents reported that their children had problems eating.

DISCUSSION

Turkish children are mostly referred for DRGA when they have a significant number of decayed teeth and cannot be treated in standard clinical conditions. At the population level, DRGA is commonly needed in Turkey, where the majority of children have decayed teeth; 69.8% of five-year-old children had caries in 2011.[4] While most children are able to undergo dental treatment in the conventional setting, some patients are too young or fail to respond to the usual behavior management techniques.[5],[6] The benefits of children’s dental care under general anesthesia are full-mouth rehabilitation in a single appointment and instant pain relief. In addition, such treatment requires little or no cooperation on the part of young children.[7],[8] Our hospital uses DRGA only as a last resort, when treatment cannot be conducted by other means, in line with the current guidelines on the use of GA in dentistry.[9] Exclusion criteria for present study Post-operative complications of naso-trachealy intubated children The face, legs, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain assessment scale Extractions and FLACC scores in each group KC: Designed the Protocol and prepared the final manuscript,MDY: Performed general anesthesia procedures, ED: was involved in data collection, SC: was involved in data collection. It seems likely that nasotracheal intubation poses few problems in terms of post-anesthetic discomfort in most children; our data suggest that a small proportion of patients may complain of some nose discomfort. We observed that 29% of the children suffered from sore throat in PACU. Similarly, Needleman et al.[10] and Holt et al.[11] reported identical prevalence rates of 27% for children with sore throat postoperatively. Most subjects in our study were intubated atraumatically. As expected, all of the seven subjects who had traumatic intubations had sore throats in the PACU. In the present study, postoperative pain was only experienced by 29.7% of the patients. However, Atan et al.[12] evaluated all the postoperative outcomes and reported that pain lasted the longest. Pain was also a common finding in the majority of previous studies investigating postoperative pain in children after receiving DRGA, the incidence of which ranged between 36% and 95%.[10]-[15] In accordance with our results, three studies reported pain to be an uncommon occurrence (0–8%).[14],[16],[17] It is important to note when comparing these studies that there is great variability among the study designs, such as the method and time(s) of pain assessment, the age and medical status of the children, and the quantity and types of procedures performed. Another possible explanation of the difference from the aforementioned studies may be that majority of the dental practitioners did not administer local anesthesia before extractions. In our study, intraoperative local anesthesia was routinely used; this likely diminished the pain in the postoperative period. The present study demonstrated a relationship between extraction and FLACC scores. Extractions caused more postoperative pain, and children who had more than four extractions were more likely to report pain. This finding agrees with several previously published studies. Needleman et al.[10] suggested that children with extractions as the most invasive dental procedure were 7-fold more likely to report pain during the postoperative period. Noble et al.[18] found that the greater the number of teeth extracted, the greater amount of distress reported. Similarly, Atan et al. reported that the odds of experiencing pain were elevated with increasing numbers of surgical procedures.[12] Therefore, in DRGA including extractions, it is important to instruct parents to give analgesics regularly on the first postoperative day. In the present study, we witnessed nasal hemorrhage for only 12.8% of nasally intubated children. However, of all of the children who present with nasal bleeding, this constituted minor bleeding, characterized as a small amount of blood tinged mucous in the oropharynx post intubation. None of the patients in this series had any complications that resulted in serious morbidity or mortality. There is limited information on the incidence of bleeding following nasotracheal intubation reported in the literature. Tintinalli and Claffey[19] observed 71 nasotracheal intubations carried out by inexperienced practitioners, under supervision, in an emergency setting. They demonstrated a hemorrhage rate of 17%. However, in only one of these patients was the hemorrhage rated as severe, defined as gross blood suctioned from the mouth or requiring nasal packing. On the other hand, bleeding from instrumentation of the upper airway via tracheal intubation has been shown to be associated with bacteremia.[20],[21] Several authors22-29 reported that bacteremia occurs more frequently after nasotracheal than orotracheal intubation. One major limitation in this study was the inclusion criteria for patients. Only patients older than 4 years scheduled for nasotracheal intubation were included. For ethical reasons, Children under 4 years of age are intubated only orally in routine dental practice under general anesthesia in our dental hospital clinic. Thus, younger children who received DRGA involving orotracheal intubation were excluded from the present study.

CONCLUSION

Based on this study’s results, the following conclusions can be made: The most common experienced postoperative symptom after DRGA was bleeding. Postoperative discomfort was related to number of the extractions. Children who had 4 or more extractions were more likely to experience pain. Nasal bleeding was an uncommon complication and did not cause serious morbidity or mortality in children intubated nasotracheally. Although an antiemetic drug (Metoclopramide) was administered to patients in the preoperative period, nausea and vomiting was observed in both the nasal intubation and oral intubation groups at a level that could not be ignored.
  28 in total

1.  Dental general anesthesia: clinical characteristics of 933 patients.

Authors:  M Vermeulen; F Vinckier; J Vandenbroucke
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb

2.  Dental anxiety, distress at induction and postoperative morbidity in children undergoing tooth extraction using general anaesthesia.

Authors:  M T Hosey; L M D Macpherson; P Adair; C Tochel; G Burnside; C Pine
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Investigation of bacteremia following nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Ozant Onçağ; Berna Cökmez; Söhret Aydemir; Taner Balcioğlu
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.556

4.  A survey of 200 pediatric dental general anesthesia cases.

Authors:  D J Enger; A P Mourino
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb

5.  Comparison of bacteremia occurring with nasotracheal and orotracheal intubation.

Authors:  F A Berry; W L Blankenbaker; C G Ball
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1973 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Complications of nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  J E Tintinalli; J Claffey
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Respiratory depression after extradural fentanyl.

Authors:  D W Noble; L M Morrison; M S Brockway; J H McClure
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Comparison of ondansetron and tropisetron combined with droperidol for the prevention of emesis in women with a history of post-operative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  M Koivuranta; T I Ala-Kokko; R Jokela; P Ranta
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Effect of palonosetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting in children following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Mustafa Denizhan Yildirim; Kenan Cantekin
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.874

10.  Postoperative pain and other sequelae of dental rehabilitations performed on children under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Howard L Needleman; Sandhya Harpavat; Sam Wu; Elizabeth N Allred; Charles Berde
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.874

View more
  10 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of Treating Severe Childhood Caries under General Anesthesia versus Conscious Sedation.

Authors:  J M Burgette; R B Quiñonez
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2018-06-04

2.  [Investigation of postoperative complications in children after dental therapy under general anesthesia].

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Deng; Yun-Han Zhang; Jing Zou; Qiong Zhang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-01

3.  Quantitative evaluation of dental anxiety indicators in the serum and saliva samples of children treated under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Sinem Yıldırım; Meltem Bakkal; Huri Bulut; Sahabettin Selek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Different Aspects of General Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review.

Authors:  Nahid Ramazani
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 0.364

5.  Efficacy of Pre-Medication with Ibuprofen on Post-Operative Pain after Pulpotomy in Primary Molars.

Authors:  Lili Shafie; Sara Esmaili; Masoud Parirokh; Abbas Pardakhti; Nouzar Nakhaee; Paul V Abbott; Hamide Barghi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018

6.  Complications after dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia in Isfahan during February to May 2016.

Authors:  Maryam Ghafournia; Alireza Eshghi; Hamid Mosleh; Pedram Iranmanesh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-07-19

Review 7.  Success rate of nitrous oxide-oxygen procedural sedation in dental patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Rossit; Victor Gil-Manich; José Manuel Ribera-Uribe
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26

8.  Intravenous ketamine, propofol and propofol-ketamine combination used for pediatric dental sedation: A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Dilek Gunay Canpolat; Mustafa Denizhan Yildirim; Recep Aksu; Nukhet Kutuk; Alper Alkan; Kenan Cantekin
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Postoperative dental morbidity in children following dental treatment under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Hu; Aileen Tsai; Li-Wei Ou-Yang; Li-Chuan Chuang; Pei-Ching Chang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Postoperative complications in Chinese children following dental general anesthesia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Qiong Zhang; Xiaoyu Deng; Yan Wang; Ruijie Huang; Ran Yang; Jing Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.