Literature DB >> 25097184

Real-time interactive treatment planning.

Karl Otto1.   

Abstract

The goal of this work is to develop an interactive treatment planning platform that permits real-time manipulation of dose distributions including DVHs and other dose metrics. The hypothesis underlying the approach proposed here is that the process of evaluating potential dose distribution options and deciding on the best clinical trade-offs may be separated from the derivation of the actual delivery parameters used for the patient's treatment. For this purpose a novel algorithm for deriving an Achievable Dose Estimate (ADE) was developed. The ADE algorithm is computationally efficient so as to update dose distributions in effectively real-time while accurately incorporating the limits of what can be achieved in practice. The resulting system is a software environment for interactive real-time manipulation of dose that permits the clinician to rapidly develop a fully customized 3D dose distribution. Graphical navigation of dose distributions is achieved by a sophisticated method of identifying contributing fluence elements, modifying those elements and re-computing the entire dose distribution. 3D dose distributions are calculated in ~2-20 ms. Including graphics processing overhead, clinicians may visually interact with the dose distribution (e.g. 'drag' a DVH) and display updates of the dose distribution at a rate of more than 20 times per second. Preliminary testing on various sites shows that interactive planning may be completed in ~1-5 min, depending on the complexity of the case (number of targets and OARs). Final DVHs are derived through a separate plan optimization step using a conventional VMAT planning system and were shown to be achievable within 2% and 4% in high and low dose regions respectively. With real-time interactive planning trade-offs between Target(s) and OARs may be evaluated efficiently providing a better understanding of the dosimetric options available to each patient in static or adaptive RT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25097184     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/17/4845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  9 in total

Review 1.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Inverse 4D conformal planning for lung SBRT using particle swarm optimization.

Authors:  A Modiri; X Gu; A Hagan; R Bland; P Iyengar; R Timmerman; A Sawant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Realizing the potential of magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy in gynaecological and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid M White; Erica Scurr; Andreas Wetscherek; Gina Brown; Aslam Sohaib; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke; David Dearnaley; Susan Lalondrelle; Shreerang Bhide
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Real-time interactive planning for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Lindsey Baker; Robert Olson; Taran Braich; Theodora Koulis; Allison Ye; Nisar Ahmed; Eric Tran; Kim Lawyer; Karl Otto; Sally Smith; Ante Mestrovic; Quinn Matthews
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-04

5.  Advanced treatment planning strategies to enhance quality and efficiency of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Luca Cozzi; Ben J M Heijmen; Ludvig P Muren
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck.

Authors:  Jerome Krayenbuehl; Ian Norton; Gabriela Studer; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Interactive dose shaping part 2: proof of concept study for six prostate patients.

Authors:  Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Peter Ziegenhein; Florian Sterzing; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Interactive dose shaping part 1: a new paradigm for IMRT treatment planning.

Authors:  Peter Ziegenhein; Cornelis Ph Kamerling; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Multicriteria plan optimization in the hands of physicians: a pilot study in prostate cancer and brain tumors.

Authors:  Birgit S Müller; Helen A Shih; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.