Literature DB >> 25096791

Faculty development for educators: a realist evaluation.

Olanrewaju O Sorinola1, Jill Thistlethwaite, David Davies, Ed Peile.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of faculty development (FD) activities for educators in UK medical schools remains underexplored. This study used a realist approach to evaluate FD and to test the hypothesis that motivation, engagement and perception are key mechanisms of effective FD activities. The authors observed and interviewed 33 course participants at one UK medical school in 2012. An observed engagement scale scored participants' engagement while interviews explored motivation for attendance, engagement during the course and perception of relevance/usefulness. Six months later, using the realist framework, 12 interviews explored impact on learning outcomes/behavioural changes, the mechanisms that led to the changes and the context that facilitated those mechanisms. The authors derived bi-axial constructs for motivation, engagement and perception from two data-sources. The predominant motivation was individualistic rather than altruistic with no difference between external and internal motives. Realist evaluation showed engagement to be the key mechanism influencing learning; the contextual factor was participatory learning during the course. Six months later, engagement remained the key mechanism influencing learning/behavioural changes; the context was reflective practice. The main outcome reported was increased confidence in teaching and empowerment to utilise previously unrecognised teaching opportunities. Individual motivation drives FD participation; however engagement is the key causal mechanism underpinning learning as it induces deeper learning with different facilitating contexts at various time points. The metrics of motivation, engagement and perception, combined with the realist framework offers FD developers the potential to understand 'what works for whom, in what context and why'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096791     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9534-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  6 in total

1.  To teach or not to teach? Assessing medical school faculty motivation to teach in the era of curriculum reform.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Hanson; Eric A Gantwerker; Deborah A Chang; Ameet S Nagpal
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  Perceptions of and Actions toward Unproductive and Deleterious Faculty.

Authors:  Shane Desselle; David Zgarrick; Sujith Ramachandran
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2021-06-10

3.  Factors shaping how clinical educators use their educational knowledge and skills in the clinical workplace: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Koshila Kumar; Jennene Greenhill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Visualizing faculty development impact: A social network analysis.

Authors:  Yang Yann Foo; James Moody; Sandy Cook
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2019-06

5.  What Really Matters for Supervision Training Workshops? A Realist Evaluation.

Authors:  Van N B Nguyen; Charlotte E Rees; Ella Ottrey; Corinne Davis; Kirsty Pope; Sarah Lee; Susan Waller; Claire Palermo
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 7.840

6.  RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations.

Authors:  Geoff Wong; Gill Westhorp; Ana Manzano; Joanne Greenhalgh; Justin Jagosh; Trish Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.775

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.