| Literature DB >> 25096525 |
Abstract
The two main data sources for the estimation of total fertility in Mongolia give figures that differ by between one-half and one child per woman. We investigated two possible explanations for these discrepancies: (i) that data on births collected in the vital registration system are incomplete and under-estimate fertility; and (ii) that fertility is over-estimated when estimates are based on data from sample surveys. We find that the under-counting of single women is the main source of the discrepancies. After adjustment, survey-based fertility estimates are very close to the figures based on data from the vital registration system. The analysis underscores the risks of taking survey-based demographic indicators as the 'Gold Standard'. Demographers need to undertake more systematic studies on this important issue.Entities:
Keywords: Mongolia; adjustment; bias; estimation; fertility; survey; vital registration
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25096525 DOI: 10.1080/00324728.2014.935461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Popul Stud (Camb) ISSN: 0032-4728