Literature DB >> 25096454

Standing or supine x-rays after total hip replacement - when is the safe zone not safe?

John Au1, Diana M Perriman, Teresa M Neeman, Paul N Smith.   

Abstract

An acetabular prosthesis orientated outside the 'safe zone' is one of the key contributing factors in increasing complications after total hip replacement (THR). Although acetabular orientation is routinely assessed using supine x-rays, standing x-rays have been proposed because a change in body position alters pelvic tilt and therefore acetabular orientation. This study aimed to assess whether acetabular components orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine can also be outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Thirty patients (12M, 18F) had lateral and antero-posterior pelvic x-rays taken in standing and supine positions six weeks post THR. Pelvic tilt and acetabular orientation (anteversion and inclination) were measured and compared with respect to the limits of the 'safe zone'. In standing, the pelvis was relatively posteriorly tilted and both acetabular anteversion and inclination increased (p<0.0001). In 16 patients the acetabulum was orientated within the 'safe zone' in supine but outside the 'safe zone' in standing. Patients were significantly more likely to be outside the 'safe zone' in standing than when supine (p<0.0001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25096454     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  9 in total

1.  Pelvic tilt compensates for increased acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Robert K Zahn; Sarah Grotjohann; Heiko Ramm; Stefan Zachow; Michael Putzier; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Practical implications of the lumbar spine and its function on total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh Gia An; Brahman Shankar Sivakumar; Yadin David Levy; Jim Pierrepont; Warwick James Bruce
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Sagittal Pelvic Kinematics in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas E Niemeier; Brad W Wills; Steven M Theiss; Shane F Strom
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

4.  [Comparative study of intra- and post-operative inclination and anteversion angles of acetabular cup in robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  Run Tian; Yutian Lei; Kunzheng Wang; Pei Yang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

5.  Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted.

Authors:  Aonnicha Burapachaisri; Ameer Elbuluk; Edem Abotsi; Jim Pierrepont; Seth A Jerabek; Aaron J Buckland; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-26

6.  Importance of the spinopelvic factors on the pelvic inclination from standing to sitting before total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hironori Ochi; Tomonori Baba; Yasuhiro Homma; Mikio Matsumoto; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kurt G Seagrave; Anders Troelsen; Henrik Malchau; Henrik Husted; Kirill Gromov
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Reliability and Validity Analysis of Pelvic Sagittal Inclination Calculated by Inverse Cosine Function Method on Pelvic Anteroposterior Radiographs.

Authors:  Hao-Han Huang; Yan Chen; Zhao-Xun Chen; Chang-Qing Zhao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Pelvic Tilt Angle Differences Between Symptom-Free Young Subjects and Elderly Patients Scheduled for THA: The Rationale for Tilt-Adjusted Acetabular Cup Implantation.

Authors:  Carlos J Marques; Tobias Martin; Andrzej Kochman; Adrian Goral; Frank Lampe; Viktor Breul; Josef Kozak
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-08-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.