| Literature DB >> 25096216 |
Lili Li1, Yunpeng Wang2.
Abstract
This paper uses Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data to investigate the spatial and temporal variations of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) over Guangdong, the most developed province in China, during 2010-2012. Linear regression and self-organizing maps (SOM) are used to investigate the relationship between AOT and its affecting factors, including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), elevation, urbanized land fraction, and several socio-economic variables. Results show that the highest values of τ 0.55 mainly occur over the rapidly-developing Pearl River Delta (PRD) region and the eastern coast. Seasonal averaged AOT is highest in summer (0.416), followed by spring (0.351), winter (0.292), and autumn (0.254). From unary linear regression and SOM analysis, AOT is shown to be strongly negatively correlated to NDVI (R(2) = 0.782) and elevation (R(2) = 0.731), and positively correlated with socio-economic factors, especially GDP, industry and vehicle density (R(2) above 0.73), but not primary industry. Multiple linear regression between AOT and the contributing factors shows much higher R(2) values (>0.8), indicative of the clear relationships between AOT and variables. This study illustrates that human activities have strong impacts on aerosols distribution in Guangdong Province. Economic and industrial developments, as well as vehicle density, are the main controlling factors on aerosol distribution.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25096216 PMCID: PMC5380013 DOI: 10.1038/srep05972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Map showing the location of the 21 administrative divisions (cities) in Guangdong province, China.
The map was produced by Li using SuperMap 6.0.
Figure 2(a) Spatial distribution of 3-year average aerosol optical thickness at 550 nm wavelength over Guangdong; (b) Topographic map of Guangdong obtained from SRTM. The AOT data was downloaded from NASA Level 1 Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS) (http://lpdaac.usgs.gov/lpdaac/get_data) and the maps were produced by Li using SuperMap 6.0.
Figure 3Seasonal variations of multi-year average AOT over Guangdong during 2010–2012.
(a) Spring (March to May); (b) Summer (June to August); (c) Autumn (September to November); (d) Winter (December to February). The map was produced by Li using SuperMap 6.0.
Total precipitation and temperature during 2010-2012 in Guangdong
| Spring | Summer | Autumn | Winter | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total precipitation (mm) | 460 | 607 | 311 | 143 |
| Average temperature (°C) | 21.3 | 28.2 | 23.6 | 13.7 |
Figure 4Relationship between τ0.55 and NDVI, elevation, urbanized land fraction and several socio-economic variables in the 21 Guangdong cities during 2010–2011.
The analysis was done by Origin software.
Figure 5(a) is the SOM visualization of AOT and its contributing factors with 13 component planes. (b) is the unified distance matrix (U-matrix) showing the distance between map neurons. Darker colors represent higher values in weight planes and larger distances in U-matrix. The map was produced in SOM toolbox in MATLAB 7.0.
Multiple linear regression models of annual AOT and contributing factors
| Independent variables | Regression model | R2 | VIF | RMSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), population density (x3) | Y = 1.462-1.518 x1-0.024 lnx2 + 0.004 lnx3 | 0.779 | 11.1, 6.2, 4.2 | 0.098 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), GDP/area (x4) | Y = 0.828-0.759x1-0.037 lnx2 + 0.049 lnx4 | 0.809 | 11.3, 6.1, 4.7 | 0.080 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), SI/area (x5) | Y = 0.842-0.656x1-0.045 lnx2 +0.047 lnx5 | 0.815 | 10.3, 5.8, 5.2 | 0.085 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), TI/area (x6) | Y = 1.023-0.851x1-0.044 lnx2 + 0.035 lnx6 | 0.806 | 10.5, 5.9, 4.3 | 0.083 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), Industry/area (x7) | Y = 0.843-0.655x1-0.044lnx2 + 0.047 lnx7 | 0.816 | 10.1, 5.7, 5.1 | 0.084 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), Construction/area (x8) | Y = 1.291-1.183x1-0.035 lnx2 + 0.023 lnx8 | 0.791 | 11.5, 6.1,4.1 | 0.09 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), CV density (x9) | Y = 0.867-0.538x1-0.054 lnx2 + 0.048lnx9 | 0.821 | 10.7, 6.1, 4.9 | 0.075 |
| NDVI (x1), elevation (x2), PV density(x10) | Y = 0.87-0.533x1-0.054 lnx2 + 0.048 lnx10 | 0.824 | 10.2, 6.1, 4.7 | 0.077 |