Literature DB >> 25095854

Bibliometric indicators for evaluating the quality of scientifc publications.

Medha A Joshi1.   

Abstract

Evaluation of quality and quantity of publications can be done using a set of statistical and mathematical indices called bibliometric indicators. Two major categories of indicators are (1) quantitative indicators that measure the research productivity of a researcher and (2) performance indicators that evaluate the quality of publications. Bibliometric indicators are important for both the individual researcher and organizations. They are widely used to compare the performance of the individual researchers, journals and universities. Many of the appointments, promotions and allocation of research funds are based on these indicators. This review article describes some of the currently used bibliometric indicators such as journal impact factor, crown indicator, h-index and it's variants. It is suggested that for comparison of scientific impact and scientific output of researchers due consideration should be given to various factors affecting theses indicators.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25095854     DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  18 in total

1.  A Scientometric Visualization Analysis for Molecular Mechanisms of Substance Abuse and Its Neurotoxicity From 1997 to 2021.

Authors:  Aijia Zhang; Zilong Liu; Man Liang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Measuring the outcome of biomedical research: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Frédérique Thonon; Rym Boulkedid; Tristan Delory; Sophie Rousseau; Mahasti Saghatchian; Wim van Harten; Claire O'Neill; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Citation Analysis for Biomedical and Health Sciences Journals Published in Korea.

Authors:  Juyeon Oh; Hyejung Chang; Jung A Kim; Mona Choi; Ziyoung Park; Yoonhee Cho; Eun-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2017-07-31

4.  Temporal Trends (1999-2015) in the Impact Factor of Biomedical Journals Published by US and EU Scientific Societies.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Margarita Kyriakidou; George Spais; Efstathia Argiti; Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2018-04-19

5.  Assessing Clinical Embryology Research: A Global Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; Agni Pantou; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Nikolaos Vlahos; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  The Congress Impact Factor: A proposal from board members of the World Society of Emergency Surgeons.it (WSES) and Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC).

Authors:  Belinda De Simone; Luca Ansaloni; Micheal Denis Kelly; Federico Coccolini; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Michele Pisano; Gianfranco Cervellin; Gianluca Baiocchi; Fausto Catena
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Jessica Herkes; Kate Churruca; Janet C Long; Chiara Pomare; Claire Boyling; Mia Bierbaum; Robyn Clay-Williams; Frances Rapport; Patti Shih; Anne Hogden; Louise A Ellis; Kristiana Ludlow; Elizabeth Austin; Rebecca Seah; Elise McPherson; Peter D Hibbert; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Tracing ovarian cancer research in Morocco: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Khalid El Bairi; Ouissam Al Jarroudi; Said Afqir
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 9.  Bibliometric analysis on global Catha edulis (khat) research production during the period of 1952-2014.

Authors:  Sa'ed H Zyoud
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 10.  Wilfully out of sight? A literature review on the effectiveness of cancer-related decision aids and implementation strategies.

Authors:  Anne Herrmann; Elise Mansfield; Alix E Hall; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Nicholas Zdenkowski
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.