OBJECTIVE: It was previously reported that docosahexanoic acid (DHA) reduces TNF-α-induced necrosis in L929 cells. However, the mechanisms underlying this reduction have not been investigated. The present study was designed to investigate cellular and biochemical mechanisms underlying the attenuation of TNF-α-induced necroptosis by DHA in L929 cells. METHODS: L929 cells were pre-treated with DHA prior to exposure to TNF-α, zVAD, or Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1). Cell death and survival were assessed by MTT and caspase activity assays, and microscopic visualization. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured by flow cytometry. C16- and C18-ceramides were measured by mass spectrometry. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry using Acridine Orange. Cathepsin L activation was evaluated by immunoblotting and fluorescence microscopy. Autophagy was assessed by immunoblotting of LC3-II and Beclin. RESULTS: Exposure of L929 cells to TNF-α alone for 24 h induced necroptosis, as evidenced by the inhibition of cell death by Nec-1, absence of caspase-3 activity and Lamin B cleavage, and morphological analysis. DHA attenuated multiple biochemical events associated with TNF-α-induced necroptosis, including ROS generation, ceramide production, lysosomal dysfunction, cathepsin L activation, and autophagic features. DHA also attenuated zVAD-induced necroptosis but did not attenuate the enhanced apoptosis and necrosis induced by the combination of TNF-α with Actinomycin D or zVAD, respectively, suggesting that its protective effects might be limited by the strength of the cell death insult induced by TNF-α. CONCLUSIONS: DHA effectively attenuates TNF-α-induced necroptosis and autophagy, most likely via its ability to inhibit TNF-α-induced sphingolipid metabolism and oxidative stress. These results highlight the role of this Omega-3 fatty acid in antagonizing inflammatory cell death.
OBJECTIVE: It was previously reported that docosahexanoic acid (DHA) reduces TNF-α-induced necrosis in L929 cells. However, the mechanisms underlying this reduction have not been investigated. The present study was designed to investigate cellular and biochemical mechanisms underlying the attenuation of TNF-α-induced necroptosis by DHA in L929 cells. METHODS:L929 cells were pre-treated with DHA prior to exposure to TNF-α, zVAD, or Necrostatin-1 (Nec-1). Cell death and survival were assessed by MTT and caspase activity assays, and microscopic visualization. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured by flow cytometry. C16- and C18-ceramides were measured by mass spectrometry. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry using Acridine Orange. Cathepsin L activation was evaluated by immunoblotting and fluorescence microscopy. Autophagy was assessed by immunoblotting of LC3-II and Beclin. RESULTS: Exposure of L929 cells to TNF-α alone for 24 h induced necroptosis, as evidenced by the inhibition of cell death by Nec-1, absence of caspase-3 activity and Lamin B cleavage, and morphological analysis. DHA attenuated multiple biochemical events associated with TNF-α-induced necroptosis, including ROS generation, ceramide production, lysosomal dysfunction, cathepsin L activation, and autophagic features. DHA also attenuated zVAD-induced necroptosis but did not attenuate the enhanced apoptosis and necrosis induced by the combination of TNF-α with Actinomycin D or zVAD, respectively, suggesting that its protective effects might be limited by the strength of the cell death insult induced by TNF-α. CONCLUSIONS:DHA effectively attenuates TNF-α-induced necroptosis and autophagy, most likely via its ability to inhibit TNF-α-induced sphingolipid metabolism and oxidative stress. These results highlight the role of this Omega-3 fatty acid in antagonizing inflammatory cell death.
Authors: K Samejima; P A Svingen; G S Basi; T Kottke; P W Mesner; L Stewart; F Durrieu; G G Poirier; E S Alnemri; J J Champoux; S H Kaufmann; W C Earnshaw Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-02-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: N Takahashi; L Duprez; S Grootjans; A Cauwels; W Nerinckx; J B DuHadaway; V Goossens; R Roelandt; F Van Hauwermeiren; C Libert; W Declercq; N Callewaert; G C Prendergast; A Degterev; J Yuan; P Vandenabeele Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Kumaran Sundaram; Andrew R Mather; Subathra Marimuthu; Parag P Shah; Ashley J Snider; Lina M Obeid; Yusuf A Hannun; Levi J Beverly; Leah J Siskind Journal: Biochem J Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Evelyn M Montes Chañi; Sandaly O S Pacheco; Gustavo A Martínez; Maykon R Freitas; Joaquin G Ivona; Javier A Ivona; Winston J Craig; Fabio J Pacheco Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Marwa Abd El-Kader; Eman Hamza; Randa El-Gamal; Amira Sobhy Rashed Eladl; Eman Mohamad El Nashar; Mansour A Alghamdi; Omnia S Erfan Journal: J Mol Histol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 2.611
Authors: Anamika Basu; Christina K Cajigas-Du Ross; Leslimar Rios-Colon; Melanie Mediavilla-Varela; Tracy R Daniels-Wells; Lai Sum Leoh; Heather Rojas; Hiya Banerjee; Shannalee R Martinez; Stephanny Acevedo-Martinez; Carlos A Casiano Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 3.240