Literature DB >> 25094024

The role of ultrasound in the management of patients with occult groin hernias.

E Alabraba1, E Psarelli2, K Meakin3, M Quinn4, M Leung4, M Hartley4, N Howes4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Groin ultrasound scanning is commonly used to examine patients with obscure groin pain or swelling. A recent study has shown ultrasound has a poor positive predictive value (PPV) in diagnosing groin hernias although earlier studies reported PPV values as high as 100%. Our aims were to calculate ultrasound's accuracy in diagnosing occult groin hernias in symptomatic patients and assess how management of these patients is affected by ultrasound result.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 375 symptomatic adult patients, who between February 2008 and March 2010, had ultrasound to diagnose groin hernias when clinical examination was inconclusive. Patients were identified on a prospective radiology database and all groin ultrasounds were performed by either one consultant radiologist or one radiographer.
RESULTS: Ultrasound was positive in 199 patients, of which 118 underwent surgery. Using operative findings as the gold standard, ultrasound's PPV for groin hernias was 70% (95% CI: 62-78%). Ultrasound was equivocal in 42 patients of which hernias were diagnosed in 7 of the 10 who had surgery. Ultrasound was negative in 151 patients of which none were later diagnosed with hernias during 3 years' median follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is poor in diagnosing occult groin hernias with a PPV of 70% suggesting a 30% chance of negative groin exploration. The equivocal ultrasound group requires careful follow-up as a considerable number were later diagnosed with hernia. The absence of subsequent hernia diagnosis in the negative ultrasound group suggests it may be a useful rule-out test to exclude occult groin hernias in symptomatic patients.
Copyright © 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Groin hernia; Occult; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25094024     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  7 in total

1.  Dear colleague, please, do not ask for ultrasound studies for inguinal hernia diagnosis.

Authors:  C Brandi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Ultrasonography in diagnosing clinically occult groin hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Multiple concurrent bilateral groin hernias in a single patient; a case report and a review of uncommon groin hernias: A possible source of persistent pain after successful repair.

Authors:  O Y Matsevych; M Z Koto; J H R Becker
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-15

5.  Evaluation of hernia of the male inguinal canal: sonographic method.

Authors:  Christopher J Jansen; Paul C Yielder
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-04-17

6.  Results at 3-year follow-up of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia surgery with long-term resorbable mesh.

Authors:  F Ruiz-Jasbon; K Ticehurst; J Ahonen; J Norrby; P Falk; M-L Ivarsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  The role of routine groin ultrasonography in the management of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Gabriel Marcil; Jennifer Schendel; Ryan Tong; Philip Mitchell; Neal Church; Artan Reso; Chad Ball; Richdeep Gill; Estifanos Debru
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.840

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.