Literature DB >> 25093690

Improved prognosis of women aged 75 and older with mammography-detected breast cancer.

Judith A Malmgren1, Jay Parikh, Mary K Atwood, Henry G Kaplan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of women aged 75 years and older with mammography-detected breast cancer, an age group not represented in mammography screening effectiveness studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a HIPAA-compliant, prospective cohort study with waiver of informed consent in patients with primary breast cancer, aged 75 years and older, with stage 0-IV disease from 1990 to 2011, identified and tracked with our registry database (n = 1162). Details including stage, treatment, outcomes, and method of detection (by patient, physician, or mammography) were noted from the chart at the time of diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier estimation was used to compare invasive disease-specific survival rates.
RESULTS: Among patients with breast cancer aged 75 years and older, mammography detection of cancers increased over time, from 49% to 70% (P < .001). Mammography-detected cases were more often stage I (62%), whereas patient- and physician-detected cases were more likely stage II and III (59%). Over time, from 1990 to 2011, the incidence of stage II cancers decreased by 8%, the incidence of stage III cancers decreased by 8%, and the incidence of stage 0 cancers increased by 15% (P < .001). Patients with mammography-detected invasive breast cancer were more often treated with lumpectomy and radiation and underwent fewer mastectomies and less chemotherapy than patients with cancer detected by patients and physicians (P < .001). Mammography detection was associated with significantly better 5-year disease-specific survival for invasive breast cancer (97% vs 87% for patient- and physician-detected cancer [P < .001], respectively).
CONCLUSION: Mammography-detected breast cancer in women 75 years and older was diagnosed at an earlier stage, required less treatment, and had better disease-specific survival than patient- or physician-detected breast cancer. These findings indicate that the same benefits of mammography detection observed in younger women extend to older women. © RSNA, 2014 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25093690     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Mammography interval and breast cancer mortality in women over the age of 75.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Cynthia A Thomson; Roberta M Ray; F Allan Hubbell; Lawrence Lessin; Dorothy S Lane; Lew H Kuller
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Hilda H Tso; Jay R Parikh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Christine E Edmonds; Sylvia A Reyes; Cletus Arciero; Vivian J Bea; Angelena Crown; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; David Y Johnson; Karen S Johnson; Jay A Baker; Mary Scott Soo; E Shelley Hwang; Sujata V Ghate
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  White-Black Differences in Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, and Survival among Adults Aged 85 Years and Older in the United States.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  The impact of mammographic screening on the surgical management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ted A James; Jacqueline E Wade; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Non-attendance of mammographic screening: the roles of age and municipality in a population-based Swedish sample.

Authors:  Maria Norfjord Zidar; Peter Larm; Per Tillgren; Sharareh Akhavan
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2015-12-30

8.  An Ad Hoc Random Initialization Deep Neural Network Architecture for Discriminating Malignant Breast Cancer Lesions in Mammographic Images.

Authors:  Andrea Duggento; Marco Aiello; Carlo Cavaliere; Giuseppe L Cascella; Davide Cascella; Giovanni Conte; Maria Guerrisi; Nicola Toschi
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 9.  Personalising therapy for early-stage oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in older women.

Authors:  Neil Carleton; Azadeh Nasrazadani; Kristine Gade; Sushil Beriwal; Parul N Barry; Adam M Brufsky; Rohit Bhargava; Wendie A Berg; Margarita L Zuley; G J van Londen; Oscar C Marroquin; Darcy L Thull; Phuong L Mai; Emilia J Diego; Michael T Lotze; Steffi Oesterreich; Priscilla F McAuliffe; Adrian V Lee
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2022-01-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.