Literature DB >> 25093257

Accuracy of a feasibility version of an intravenous continuous glucose monitor in volunteers with diabetes and hospitalized patients.

Luc A Foubert1, Patrick V Lecomte, Frank R Nobels, Angela M Gulino, Koen H De Decker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A feasibility version of the GlucoClear™ continuous glucose monitoring system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), the intravenous blood glucose (IVBG) system, developed to facilitate glycemic management, was evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two pilot studies were conducted. Ten volunteers with diabetes (1,725 matched pairs) and 10 patients scheduled for intensive care unit (ICU) admission following surgery (1,393 matched pairs) were studied. The patients' blood glucose concentrations were monitored by the IVBG system every 5 min for up to 72 h. The accuracy of the IVBG system was calculated and compared with the Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) (Yellows Springs, OH) and Radiometer (Copenhagen, Denmark) measurements to determine the percentage of matched pairs that met 15/20%, 10/15%, 12/12.5%, and 10/10% assessment criteria. Performance was calculated as the percentage of the total measurements that would have been displayed in an unblinded study. Adverse events were monitored.
RESULTS: The accuracy of the IVBG system met the International Organization for Standardization ISO 15197 15/20% criterion (99.07% in volunteers, 99.43% in the ICU, and both vs. YSI) and the stricter 10/15% criterion (96.17% in volunteers, 96.77% in the ICU, and both vs. YSI) over the 72-h period and across a broad range of blood glucose concentrations. Performance was 89.97% in the ICU study. The adverse device effects included induration of the peripheral vein, mild bruising, and mild hematoma. In the volunteers, there were patency problems with six catheters.
CONCLUSIONS: The IVBG system is safe, accurate, and reliable. This minimally invasive system was not affected by potentially interfering medications. Real-time measurements, alarms, and trends provided by the IVBG system might support glycemic control protocols and prevent glycemic events in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25093257     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  6 in total

Review 1.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Designing the Glucose Telemetry for Hospital Management: From Bedside to the Nursing Station.

Authors:  Medha Satyarengga; Tariq Siddiqui; Elias K Spanakis
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Multicenter Observational Study of the First-Generation Intravenous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Grant V Bochicchio; Brian R Hipszer; Michelle F Magee; Richard M Bergenstal; Anthony P Furnary; Angela M Gulino; Michael J Higgins; Peter C Simpson; Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 4.  Vascular Glucose Sensor Symposium: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) for Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients at Risk for Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph; Marc C Torjman; Paul J Strasma
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Manual versus Automated moNitoring Accuracy of GlucosE II (MANAGE II).

Authors:  Cláudia Righy Shinotsuka; Alexandre Brasseur; David Fagnoul; Timothy So; Jean-Louis Vincent; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  The Clinical Benefits and Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Sigrid C J van Steen; Saskia Rijkenberg; Jacqueline Limpens; Peter H J van der Voort; Jeroen Hermanides; J Hans DeVries
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.