Xiaorong Chen1, Hongjie Hu1, Yue Qian1, Jiner Shu1. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, China ; 2 Department of Radiology, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua 321000, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on the diastolic volume recovery of left ventricle in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Twenty-four HCM patients were studied through report-card 4.0. The presence or absence of late gadolinium enhancement was recorded according to a standardized methodology with a threshold value of six standard deviations above background. The LGE positive and negative groups were correlated to left ventricular end diastolic volume index (EDVI), left ventricular mass, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejecting rate (PER), normalized peak filling or ejecting rate (NPFR or NPER), time to peak filling or ejecting rate (TPFR or TPER), and diastolic volume recovery (DVR). RESULTS: PFR, NPFR, SV, SVI, EF, CO, CI, FS in LGE positive group were lower than LGE negative group, DVR10-40, DVR100, end systolic volume (ESV), end systolic volume index (ESVI), ESD were higher in LGE positive group, and the differences were statistically significant. The average LGE mass (ROI, region of interest) was 20.78 g, about 13.67% of left ventricle mass in LGE positive HCM group. Pearson correlation was noted between the LGE percent (ROI%) and ESV (0.692, P<0.05), ROI% and EF (-0.718, P<0.05), ROI% and PFR (-0.534, P<0.05), DVR20-40 (0.547, 0.544, 0.906, P<0.05) etc. The correlation between ROI% and DVR40 was best (0.906, P<0.05), and the correlation between ROI% and ESVI, ROI% and EF were both bigger than 0.7, showed the correlation was good. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to common quotas used to assess the structure and function of left ventricle in HCM, volume-time curve parameters may have potential to evaluate cardiac function in HCM. The correlation between DVR generated from volume-time curve with LGE was good, and may be a marker of effect of enhancement/scar tissue on diastolic function.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on the diastolic volume recovery of left ventricle in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Twenty-four HCM patients were studied through report-card 4.0. The presence or absence of late gadolinium enhancement was recorded according to a standardized methodology with a threshold value of six standard deviations above background. The LGE positive and negative groups were correlated to left ventricular end diastolic volume index (EDVI), left ventricular mass, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), peak filling rate (PFR), peak ejecting rate (PER), normalized peak filling or ejecting rate (NPFR or NPER), time to peak filling or ejecting rate (TPFR or TPER), and diastolic volume recovery (DVR). RESULTS: PFR, NPFR, SV, SVI, EF, CO, CI, FS in LGE positive group were lower than LGE negative group, DVR10-40, DVR100, end systolic volume (ESV), end systolic volume index (ESVI), ESD were higher in LGE positive group, and the differences were statistically significant. The average LGE mass (ROI, region of interest) was 20.78 g, about 13.67% of left ventricle mass in LGE positive HCM group. Pearson correlation was noted between the LGE percent (ROI%) and ESV (0.692, P<0.05), ROI% and EF (-0.718, P<0.05), ROI% and PFR (-0.534, P<0.05), DVR20-40 (0.547, 0.544, 0.906, P<0.05) etc. The correlation between ROI% and DVR40 was best (0.906, P<0.05), and the correlation between ROI% and ESVI, ROI% and EF were both bigger than 0.7, showed the correlation was good. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to common quotas used to assess the structure and function of left ventricle in HCM, volume-time curve parameters may have potential to evaluate cardiac function in HCM. The correlation between DVR generated from volume-time curve with LGE was good, and may be a marker of effect of enhancement/scar tissue on diastolic function.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); late gadolinium enhancement (LGE); magnetic resonance imaging; volume-time curve
Authors: Caitlin J Harrigan; Dana C Peters; C Michael Gibson; Barry J Maron; Warren J Manning; Martin S Maron; Evan Appelbaum Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Evan Appelbaum; Barry J Maron; Selcuk Adabag; Thomas H Hauser; John R Lesser; Tammy S Haas; Anne B Riley; Caitlin J Harrigan; Francesca N Delling; James E Udelson; C Michael Gibson; Warren J Manning; Martin S Maron Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Keigo Kawaji; Noel C F Codella; Martin R Prince; Christopher W Chu; Aqsa Shakoor; Troy M LaBounty; James K Min; Rajesh V Swaminathan; Richard B Devereux; Yi Wang; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Thananya Boonyasirinant; Prabhakar Rajiah; Randolph M Setser; Michael L Lieber; Harry M Lever; Milind Y Desai; Scott D Flamm Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lubna Choudhury; Heiko Mahrholdt; Anja Wagner; Kelly M Choi; Michael D Elliott; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-12-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dorinna D Mendoza; Noel C F Codella; Yi Wang; Martin R Prince; Sonia Sethi; Shant J Manoushagian; Keigo Kawaji; James K Min; Troy M LaBounty; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Michael Quail; Karl Grunseich; Lauren A Baldassarre; Hamid Mojibian; Mark A Marieb; Daniel Cornfeld; Aaron Soufer; Albert J Sinusas; Dana C Peters Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 5.364