Literature DB >> 25092482

The European Treatment and Outcome Study score is associated with clinical outcomes and treatment response following European LeukemiaNet 2013 recommendations in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Noriyoshi Iriyama1, Yoshihiro Hatta, Sumiko Kobayashi, Yoshihito Uchino, Katsuhiro Miura, Daisuke Kurita, Hitomi Kodaira, Mitsuru Inoue, Masami Takei.   

Abstract

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has dramatically improved outcomes for many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but some cases are resistant to this treatment. To compare the prognostic performance of Sokal, Hasford, and European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) scores, patient outcomes and treatment responses were investigated following the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2013 recommendations. Seventy-three patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML (CML-CP) treated with any tyrosine kinase inhibitor as initial therapy were analyzed. All scoring systems significantly predicted treatment response at 3 and 6 months; however, only the EUTOS score significantly predicted treatment response at 12 months, following the ELN 2013 recommendations. The 5-year event-free survival rates were 93 and 35 % in the low- and high-risk groups according to the EUTOS score (P < 0.0001). Moreover, the 5-year overall survival rates were 98 and 51 % in the low- and high-risk groups by EUTOS score (P < 0.0001). We suggest that the EUTOS score may provide a better stratification of CML-CP patients for predicting treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25092482     DOI: 10.1007/s12185-014-1649-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hematol        ISSN: 0925-5710            Impact factor:   2.490


  20 in total

1.  EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Jorge Cortes; Aziz Nazha; Susan O'Brien; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Sherry Pierce; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  EUTOS score predicts long-term outcome but not optimal response to imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Mario Tiribelli; Massimiliano Bonifacio; Elisabetta Calistri; Gianni Binotto; Elena Maino; Luciana Marin; Emanuele Guardalben; Antonio Branca; Filippo Gherlinzoni; Gianpietro Semenzato; Rosaria Sancetta; Giovanni Pizzolo; Renato Fanin
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Comprehensive therapeutic outcomes of frontline imatinib mesylate in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients in Korea: feasibility assessment of current ELN recommendation.

Authors:  Dongho Kim; Hyun Gyung Goh; Soo-Hyun Kim; Soo-Young Choi; Sa-Hee Park; Eun-Jung Jang; Dong-Wook Kim
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Seven-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia by the TARGET system.

Authors:  Tetsuzo Tauchi; Masahiro Kizaki; Shinichiro Okamoto; Hideo Tanaka; Mitsune Tanimoto; Koiti Inokuchi; Tohru Murayama; Yoshio Saburi; Masayuki Hino; Mitsuru Tsudo; Taizo Shimomura; Yasushi Isobe; Kazuo Oshimi; Kazuo Dan; Kazuma Ohyashiki; Yasuo Ikeda
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Transcription-mediated amplification and hybridisation protection assay to determine BCR-ABL transcript levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  S E Langabeer; R E Gale; R C Harvey; R W Cook; S Mackinnon; D C Linch
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Prognostic discrimination in "good-risk" chronic granulocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J E Sokal; E B Cox; M Baccarani; S Tura; G A Gomez; J E Robertson; C Y Tso; T J Braun; B D Clarkson; F Cervantes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Patterns and prognostic indicators of response to CML treatment in a multi-country medical record review study.

Authors:  Peter C Trask; Debanjali Mitra; Shrividya Iyer; Sean D Candrilli; James A Kaye
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Saglio; Dong-Wook Kim; Surapol Issaragrisil; Philipp le Coutre; Gabriel Etienne; Clarisse Lobo; Ricardo Pasquini; Richard E Clark; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy P Hughes; Neil Gallagher; Albert Hoenekopp; Mei Dong; Ariful Haque; Richard A Larson; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Michele Baccarani; Jorge Cortes; Fabrizio Pane; Dietger Niederwieser; Giuseppe Saglio; Jane Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Michael Deininger; Alois Gratwohl; François Guilhot; Andreas Hochhaus; Mary Horowitz; Timothy Hughes; Hagop Kantarjian; Richard Larson; Jerald Radich; Bengt Simonsson; Richard T Silver; John Goldman; Rudiger Hehlmann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  European Treatment and Outcome Study score does not predict imatinib treatment response and outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Eri Yamamoto; Shin Fujisawa; Maki Hagihara; Masatsugu Tanaka; Katsumichi Fujimaki; Kumiko Kishimoto; Chizuko Hashimoto; Megumi Itabashi; Daisuke Ishibashi; Yuki Nakajima; Takayoshi Tachibana; Rika Kawasaki; Hideyuki Kuwabara; Hideyuki Koharazawa; Etsuko Yamazaki; Naoto Tomita; Rika Sakai; Hiroyuki Fujita; Heiwa Kanamori; Yoshiaki Ishigatsubo
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  6 in total

1.  The criteria to suspect chronic myeloid leukemia using absolute basophil counts in peripheral blood.

Authors:  Akiko Masuda; Masahiro Jona; Yumiko Satoh; Michiko Terashima; Hironori Shimosaka; Yasuhito Nannya; Hiromitsu Yokota; Mineo Kurokawa; Yutaka Yatomi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Charlson comorbidity index predicts poor outcome in CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Authors:  Makiko Uemura; Osamu Imataki; Yasunori Kawachi; Kimihiro Kawakami; Yasuo Hoshijima; Akihito Matsuoka; Norimitsu Kadowaki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Exome, transcriptome and miRNA analysis don't reveal any molecular markers of TKI efficacy in primary CML patients.

Authors:  Alexander V Lavrov; Ekaterina Yu Chelysheva; Elmira P Adilgereeva; Oleg A Shukhov; Svetlana A Smirnikhina; Konstantin S Kochergin-Nikitsky; Valentina D Yakushina; Grigory A Tsaur; Sergey V Mordanov; Anna G Turkina; Sergey I Kutsev
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.063

4.  Comparison of the clinical outcomes of nilotinib and dasatinib therapies in newly diagnosed patients in the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Noriyoshi Iriyama; Kei-Ji Sugimoto; Eriko Sato; Tomoiku Takaku; Michihide Tokuhira; Tomonori Nakazato; Maho Ishikawa; Hiroyuki Fujita; Isao Fujioka; Yuta Kimura; Norio Asou; Masahiro Kizaki; Norio Komatsu; Yoshihiro Hatta; Tatsuya Kawaguchi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  The EUTOS long-term survival score predicts disease-specific mortality and molecular responses among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in a practice-based cohort.

Authors:  Eriko Sato; Noriyoshi Iriyama; Michihide Tokuhira; Tomoiku Takaku; Maho Ishikawa; Tomonori Nakazato; Kei-Ji Sugimoto; Hiroyuki Fujita; Yuta Kimura; Isao Fujioka; Norio Asou; Norio Komatsu; Masahiro Kizaki; Yoshihiro Hatta; Tatsuya Kawaguchi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Analysis of 2013 European LeukaemiaNet (ELN) responses in chronic phase CML across four frontline TKI modalities and impact on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Preetesh Jain; Hagop Kantarjian; Koji Sasaki; Elias Jabbour; Jyothsna Dasarathula; Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez; Srdan Verstovsek; Gautam Borthakur; William Wierda; Tapan Kadia; Sara Dellasala; Sherry Pierce; Farhad Ravandi; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.998

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.