Literature DB >> 25092356

Clinical evaluation of early postpartum pain and healing outcomes after mediolateral versus lateral episiotomy.

Jaroslava Karbanova1, Zdenek Rusavy1, Lucie Betincova1, Magdalena Jansova2, Pavlina Necesalova1, Vladimir Kalis3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term perineal pain among primiparous women after mediolateral episiotomy (MLE) and lateral episiotomy (LE).
METHODS: The prospective randomized study was conducted in the Czech Republic during 2010-2012. Consecutive primiparous women who gave birth at or after 37 weeks of pregnancy and had indications for an episiotomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo MLE or LE. Patients were unaware of the episiotomy type performed. The primary outcomes were pain at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 10 days post partum, measured by a visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, interference with activities of daily living, and amount of analgesic use.
RESULTS: The analysis included 266 women who underwent MLE and 297 women who underwent LE. Complete relief of pain was observed in 6 (2.3%) of 266 women after 24 hours, 21 (8.0%) of 264 after 72 hours, and 77 (29.1%) of 265 after 10 days in the MLE group, and in 11 (3.9%) of 285, 23 (7.7%) of 297, and 78 (26.4%) of 295 in the LE group, respectively (P=0.36). There were no significant differences in overall pain scores from any rating system or in the amount of analgesics used.
CONCLUSION: Incidence and extent of pain in the first 10 days after LE correspond to those after adequately performed MLE.
Copyright © 2014 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lateral episiotomy; Mediolateral episiotomy; Pain; Painful defecation; Visual analog scale; Wound healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25092356     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

Review 1.  Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Xu Qian; Guillermo Carroli; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-08

2.  The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roeland Odijk; Bernadette Hennipman; Melek Rousian; Khadija Madani; Marja Dijksterhuis; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Arjan van Hof
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sandra Bergendahl; Victoria Ankarcrona; Åsa Leijonhufvud; Susanne Hesselman; Sofie Karlström; Helena Kopp Kallner; Sophia Brismar Wendel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Ropivacaine 75 mg versus placebo in perineal infiltration for analgesic efficacy at mid- and long-term for episiotomy repair in postpartum women - the ROPISIO study: a two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Claire Cardaillac; Stéphane Ploteau; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Vincent Dochez; Norbert Winer; Guillaume Ducarme
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.