Eric Balent1, Mary Edwards2, Michael Lustik3, Paul Martin1. 1. Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler Army Medical Center, HI. 2. Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler Army Medical Center, HI. Electronic address: mary.j.edwards@us.army.mil. 3. Department of Clinical Investigation, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler Army Medical Center, HI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The use of caudal anesthesia with sedation (CAS) has theoretical benefits over general anesthesia (GA) in high risk neonates undergoing inguinal hernia repair. This benefit has not been established in clinical studies. We compare outcomes of these two approaches at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all neonates and preterm infants undergoing inguinal hernia over an 8year period. RESULTS: Of 71 infants meeting inclusion criteria, 50 underwent repair with caudal block and systemic sedation, and 21 with general anesthesia. Minor incidents of respiratory depression requiring non invasive interventions were common in the first 24h post operatively (24% for CAS, 14% with GA), 4% of patients receiving CAS had a respiratory complication which prolonged their hospital stay beyond 24h post operation. Both required conversion to general anesthesia. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were lacking in terms of preoperative risk and post operative outcome. CONCLUSIONS: CAS is a safe, effective anesthetic option for high risk neonates undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Patients requiring conversion to GA from CAS may be at increased risk for complications. Large, randomized trials are needed to determine any benefit over GA. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: The use of caudal anesthesia with sedation (CAS) has theoretical benefits over general anesthesia (GA) in high risk neonates undergoing inguinal hernia repair. This benefit has not been established in clinical studies. We compare outcomes of these two approaches at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all neonates and preterm infants undergoing inguinal hernia over an 8year period. RESULTS: Of 71 infants meeting inclusion criteria, 50 underwent repair with caudal block and systemic sedation, and 21 with general anesthesia. Minor incidents of respiratory depression requiring non invasive interventions were common in the first 24h post operatively (24% for CAS, 14% with GA), 4% of patients receiving CAS had a respiratory complication which prolonged their hospital stay beyond 24h post operation. Both required conversion to general anesthesia. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were lacking in terms of preoperative risk and post operative outcome. CONCLUSIONS:CAS is a safe, effective anesthetic option for high risk neonates undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Patients requiring conversion to GA from CAS may be at increased risk for complications. Large, randomized trials are needed to determine any benefit over GA. Published by Elsevier Inc.