BACKGROUND: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated guidelines in 2009 recommending aspirin to prevent myocardial infarction among at-risk men and stroke among at-risk women. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine clinician aspirin recommendation among eligible persons based on cardiovascular risk scores and USPSTF cutoffs. DESIGN: We used across-sectional analysis of a current nationally representative sample. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 40 years and older, and in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2011-2012). MAIN MEASURES: We determined aspirin eligibility for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention for each participant based on reported and assessed cardiovascular risk factors. We assessed men's risk using a published coronary heart disease risk calculator based on Framingham equations, and used a similar calculator for stroke to assess risk for women. We applied the USPSTF risk cutoffs for sex and age that account for offsetting risk for gastrointestinal hemorrhage. We assessed clinician recommendation for aspirin based on participant report. RESULTS: Among men 45-79 years and women 55-79 years, 87 % of men and 16 % of women were potentially eligible for primary CVD aspirin prevention. Clinician recommendation rates for aspirin among those eligible were low, 34 % for men and 42 % for women. Rates were highest among diabetics (63 %), those 65 to 79 years (52 %) or those in poor health (44 %). In contrast, aspirin recommendation rates were 76 % for CVD secondary prevention. After accounting for patient factors, particularly age, eligibility for aspirin prevention was not significantly associated with receiving a clinician's recommendation for aspirin (AOR 0.99 %; CI 0.7-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an "A recommendation" from the USPSTF for aspirin for primary prevention of CVD, the majority of men and women potentially eligible for aspirin did not recall a clinical recommendation from their clinician.
BACKGROUND: The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated guidelines in 2009 recommending aspirin to prevent myocardial infarction among at-risk men and stroke among at-risk women. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine clinician aspirin recommendation among eligible persons based on cardiovascular risk scores and USPSTF cutoffs. DESIGN: We used across-sectional analysis of a current nationally representative sample. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were aged 40 years and older, and in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2011-2012). MAIN MEASURES: We determined aspirin eligibility for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention for each participant based on reported and assessed cardiovascular risk factors. We assessed men's risk using a published coronary heart disease risk calculator based on Framingham equations, and used a similar calculator for stroke to assess risk for women. We applied the USPSTF risk cutoffs for sex and age that account for offsetting risk for gastrointestinal hemorrhage. We assessed clinician recommendation for aspirin based on participant report. RESULTS: Among men 45-79 years and women 55-79 years, 87 % of men and 16 % of women were potentially eligible for primary CVD aspirin prevention. Clinician recommendation rates for aspirin among those eligible were low, 34 % for men and 42 % for women. Rates were highest among diabetics (63 %), those 65 to 79 years (52 %) or those in poor health (44 %). In contrast, aspirin recommendation rates were 76 % for CVD secondary prevention. After accounting for patient factors, particularly age, eligibility for aspirin prevention was not significantly associated with receiving a clinician's recommendation for aspirin (AOR 0.99 %; CI 0.7-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an "A recommendation" from the USPSTF for aspirin for primary prevention of CVD, the majority of men and women potentially eligible for aspirin did not recall a clinical recommendation from their clinician.
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Stacey L Sheridan; Anthony J Viera; Mori J Krantz; Christa L Ice; Lesley E Steinman; Karen E Peters; Laurie A Kopin; Danielle Lungelow Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-02-08
Authors: F Gerald R Fowkes; Jacqueline F Price; Marlene C W Stewart; Isabella Butcher; Gillian C Leng; Alistair C H Pell; Peter A G Sandercock; Keith A A Fox; Gordon D O Lowe; Gordon D Murray Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael Pignone; George K Anderson; Katherine Binns; Hugh H Tilson; Steven M Weisman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Benjamin D Horne; Heidi T May; Joseph B Muhlestein; Brianna S Ronnow; Donald L Lappé; Dale G Renlund; Abdallah G Kfoury; John F Carlquist; Patrick W Fisher; Robert R Pearson; Tami L Bair; Jeffrey L Anderson Journal: Am J Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Colin Baigent; Lisa Blackwell; Rory Collins; Jonathan Emberson; Jon Godwin; Richard Peto; Julie Buring; Charles Hennekens; Patricia Kearney; Tom Meade; Carlo Patrono; Maria Carla Roncaglioni; Alberto Zanchetti Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-05-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hans Krueger; Sylvia Robinson; Trevor Hancock; Richard Birtwhistle; Jane A Buxton; Bonnie Henry; Jennifer Scarr; John J Spinelli Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Qiuping Gu; Charles F Dillon; Mark S Eberhardt; Jacqueline D Wright; Vicki L Burt Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Russell V Luepker; Niki C Oldenburg; Jeffrey R Misialek; Jeremy R Van't Hof; John R Finnegan; Milton Eder; Sue Duval Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Tzeyu L Michaud; Jean Abraham; Hawre Jalal; Russell V Luepker; Sue Duval; Alan T Hirsch Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 5.501