Minal R Patel1, Cleopatra H Caldwell2, Peter X K Song3, John R C Wheeler4. 1. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: minalrp@umich.edu. 2. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the complexity of the health insurance market in the United States and the confusion that often stems from these complexities, patient perception about the value of health insurance in managing chronic disease is important to understand. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences between public and private health insurance in perceptions of financial burden with managing asthma, outcomes, and factors that explain these perceptions. METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed using baseline data from a randomized clinical trial that were collected through telephone interviews with 219 African American women seeking services for asthma and reporting perceptions of financial burden with asthma management. Path analysis with multigroup models and multiple variable regression analyses were used to examine associations. RESULTS: For public (P < .001) and private (P < .01) coverage, being married and more educated were indirectly associated with greater perceptions of financial burden through different explanatory pathways. When adjusted for multiple morbidities, asthma control, income, and out-of-pocket expenses, those with private insurance used fewer inpatient (P < .05) and emergency department (P < .001) services compared with those with public insurance. When also adjusted for health insurance, greater financial burden was associated with more urgent office visits (P < .001) and lower quality of life (P < .001). CONCLUSION:African American women who perceive asthma as a financial burden regardless of health insurance report more urgent health care visits and lower quality of life. Burden may be present despite having and being able to generate economic resources and health insurance. Further policy efforts are indicated and special attention should focus on type of coverage.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Given the complexity of the health insurance market in the United States and the confusion that often stems from these complexities, patient perception about the value of health insurance in managing chronic disease is important to understand. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences between public and private health insurance in perceptions of financial burden with managing asthma, outcomes, and factors that explain these perceptions. METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed using baseline data from a randomized clinical trial that were collected through telephone interviews with 219 African American women seeking services for asthma and reporting perceptions of financial burden with asthma management. Path analysis with multigroup models and multiple variable regression analyses were used to examine associations. RESULTS: For public (P < .001) and private (P < .01) coverage, being married and more educated were indirectly associated with greater perceptions of financial burden through different explanatory pathways. When adjusted for multiple morbidities, asthma control, income, and out-of-pocket expenses, those with private insurance used fewer inpatient (P < .05) and emergency department (P < .001) services compared with those with public insurance. When also adjusted for health insurance, greater financial burden was associated with more urgent office visits (P < .001) and lower quality of life (P < .001). CONCLUSION: African American women who perceive asthma as a financial burden regardless of health insurance report more urgent health care visits and lower quality of life. Burden may be present despite having and being able to generate economic resources and health insurance. Further policy efforts are indicated and special attention should focus on type of coverage.
Authors: Jon R Gabel; Roland McDevitt; Ryan Lore; Jeremy Pickreign; Heidi Whitmore; Tina Ding Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Michael D Cabana; Kathryn K Slish; David Evans; Robert B Mellins; Randall W Brown; Xihong Lin; Niko Kaciroti; Noreen M Clark Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jongwha Chang; Gary L Freed; Lisa A Prosser; Isha Patel; Steven R Erickson; Richard P Bagozzi; Rajesh Balkrishnan Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Chien-Wen Tseng; R Adams Dudley; Robert H Brook; Emmett Keeler; W Neil Steers; G Caleb Alexander; Beth E Waitzfelder; Carol M Mangione Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Michael Schatz; Christine A Sorkness; James T Li; Philip Marcus; John J Murray; Robert A Nathan; Mark Kosinski; Trudy B Pendergraft; Priti Jhingran Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Mohsen Bazargan; James L Smith; Sharon Cobb; Lisa Barkley; Cheryl Wisseh; Emma Ngula; Ricky J Thomas; Shervin Assari Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 3.390