Literature DB >> 25091172

Optimization of anemia treatment in hemodialysis patients via reinforcement learning.

Pablo Escandell-Montero1, Milena Chermisi2, José M Martínez-Martínez3, Juan Gómez-Sanchis3, Carlo Barbieri2, Emilio Soria-Olivas3, Flavio Mari2, Joan Vila-Francés3, Andrea Stopper2, Emanuele Gatti4, José D Martín-Guerrero3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anemia is a frequent comorbidity in hemodialysis patients that can be successfully treated by administering erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). ESAs dosing is currently based on clinical protocols that often do not account for the high inter- and intra-individual variability in the patient's response. As a result, the hemoglobin level of some patients oscillates around the target range, which is associated with multiple risks and side-effects. This work proposes a methodology based on reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize ESA therapy.
METHODS: RL is a data-driven approach for solving sequential decision-making problems that are formulated as Markov decision processes (MDPs). Computing optimal drug administration strategies for chronic diseases is a sequential decision-making problem in which the goal is to find the best sequence of drug doses. MDPs are particularly suitable for modeling these problems due to their ability to capture the uncertainty associated with the outcome of the treatment and the stochastic nature of the underlying process. The RL algorithm employed in the proposed methodology is fitted Q iteration, which stands out for its ability to make an efficient use of data.
RESULTS: The experiments reported here are based on a computational model that describes the effect of ESAs on the hemoglobin level. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated and compared with the well-known Q-learning algorithm and with a standard protocol. Simulation results show that the performance of Q-learning is substantially lower than FQI and the protocol. When comparing FQI and the protocol, FQI achieves an increment of 27.6% in the proportion of patients that are within the targeted range of hemoglobin during the period of treatment. In addition, the quantity of drug needed is reduced by 5.13%, which indicates a more efficient use of ESAs.
CONCLUSION: Although prospective validation is required, promising results demonstrate the potential of RL to become an alternative to current protocols.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic kidney disease; Darbepoietin alfa; Fitted Q iteration; Markov decision processes; Reinforcement learning; Renal anemia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25091172     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2014.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  12 in total

1.  Optimizing the dynamic treatment regime of in-hospital warfarin anticoagulation in patients after surgical valve replacement using reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Juntong Zeng; Jianzhun Shao; Shen Lin; Hongchang Zhang; Xiaoting Su; Xiaocong Lian; Yan Zhao; Xiangyang Ji; Zhe Zheng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: How Can Artificial Intelligence Augment Nephrologists' Intelligence?

Authors:  Guotong Xie; Tiange Chen; Yingxue Li; Tingyu Chen; Xiang Li; Zhihong Liu
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence for the Artificial Kidney: Pointers to the Future of a Personalized Hemodialysis Therapy.

Authors:  Miguel Hueso; Alfredo Vellido; Nuria Montero; Carlo Barbieri; Rosa Ramos; Manuel Angoso; Josep Maria Cruzado; Anders Jonsson
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-25

4.  Reinforcement Learning Assisted Oxygen Therapy for COVID-19 Patients Under Intensive Care.

Authors:  Hua Zheng; Jiahao Zhu; Wei Xie; Judy Zhong
Journal:  ArXiv       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 5.  Using Artificial Intelligence Resources in Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Patients: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Alexandru Burlacu; Adrian Iftene; Daniel Jugrin; Iolanda Valentina Popa; Paula Madalina Lupu; Cristiana Vlad; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Inverse reinforcement learning for intelligent mechanical ventilation and sedative dosing in intensive care units.

Authors:  Chao Yu; Jiming Liu; Hongyi Zhao
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Personalized Multimorbidity Management for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Reinforcement Learning of Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Hua Zheng; Ilya O Ryzhov; Wei Xie; Judy Zhong
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Overcoming Challenges of Applying Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Vehicle Control.

Authors:  Rafael Pina; Haileleol Tibebu; Joosep Hook; Varuna De Silva; Ahmet Kondoz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Haemoglobin variability and all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingfei Zhao; Chenxia Hu; Jun Cheng; Ping Zhang; Hua Jiang; Jianghua Chen
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Reinforcement learning and Bayesian data assimilation for model-informed precision dosing in oncology.

Authors:  Corinna Maier; Niklas Hartung; Charlotte Kloft; Wilhelm Huisinga; Jana de Wiljes
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.