Literature DB >> 25089691

A comprehensive evaluation of inorganic arsenic in food and considerations for dietary intake analyses.

Heather N Lynch1, Grace I Greenberg1, Margaret C Pollock1, Ari S Lewis2.   

Abstract

Arsenic (As) can exist in the environment in several different forms, each having unique chemical characteristics that influence its toxicity and potential for human and ecological exposure. Within the last decade or so, the focus on speciated As (both the inorganic and organic forms) and its potential toxicity has led to an increased availability of data on speciated As in different food types. To gain an understanding of these developments and the current science, we evaluated the state of knowledge regarding As speciation in food and calculated the average levels of several species of As measured in food. Because inorganic arsenic (inAs) is considered the most toxicologically important form of As, we focused our analysis on papers presenting information on total inAs and speciated inAs (inAs(3+) or inAs(5+)). We also evaluated speciated As forms (e.g., monomethylarsonic and dimethylarsinic acid) when presented with inAs information. Publications were drawn from the peer-reviewed literature and reports by authoritative health agencies. While a great deal of speciation data were identified, including over 6500 unique inAs data points, unclear study methodology and inconsistencies between studies introduced uncertainty into the analysis of these data. Despite these limitations, our analysis demonstrates that inAs in foods can vary widely by type and even by sample, with mean inAs concentrations ranging from undetectable (in milk) to 11,000 μg/kg (in seaweed/algae). We found a high percentage of non-measurable As in many food types, suggesting that the limits of detection of speciated As must be considered to accurately estimate dietary As exposure. The applicability of our analysis is limited by the inconsistencies and uncertainties in the available data; calculations of inAs dietary intake should be tailored to the study population of interest and should consider study quality.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Dietary exposure; Food; Inorganic arsenic; Risk assessment; Speciated

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25089691     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  14 in total

1.  Lifetime excess cancer risk due to carcinogens in food and beverages: Urban versus rural differences in Canada.

Authors:  Roslyn Cheasley; C Peter Keller; Eleanor Setton
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2017-09-14

2.  Human exposure to dietary inorganic arsenic and other arsenic species: State of knowledge, gaps and uncertainties.

Authors:  Francesco Cubadda; Brian P Jackson; Kathryn L Cottingham; Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Margaret Kurzius-Spencer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Human exposure to organic arsenic species from seafood.

Authors:  Vivien Taylor; Britton Goodale; Andrea Raab; Tanja Schwerdtle; Ken Reimer; Sean Conklin; Margaret R Karagas; Kevin A Francesconi
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Embryonic-only arsenic exposure in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) reduces growth and alters muscle IGF levels one year later.

Authors:  Dana B Szymkowicz; Kaleigh C Sims; Noemi M Castro; William C Bridges; Lisa J Bain
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  Provision of folic acid for reducing arsenic toxicity in arsenic-exposed children and adults.

Authors:  Sajin Bae; Elena Kamynina; Heather M Guetterman; Adetutu F Farinola; Marie A Caudill; Robert J Berry; Patricia A Cassano; Patrick J Stover
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-18

6.  Simultaneous analysis 26 mineral element contents from highly consumed cultured chicken overexposed to arsenic trioxide by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ying He; Bonan Sun; Siwen Li; Xiao Sun; Ying Guo; Hongjing Zhao; Yu Wang; Guangshun Jiang; Mingwei Xing
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Risk of exposure to total and inorganic arsenic by meat intake among different age groups from Brazil: a probabilistic assessment.

Authors:  Lucas Silva Azevedo; Inacio Abreu Pestana; Annaliza Carvalho Meneguelli-Souza; Bruno Ramos; Daniel Ribeiro Pessanha; Dayana Caldas; Marcelo Gomes Almeida; Cristina Maria Magalhaes de Souza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Assessment of arsenic in colostrum and cord serum and risk exposure to neonates from an island population in China.

Authors:  Chenye Xu; Mengling Tang; Siyu Zhu; Hua Naranmandura; Weiping Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Low-Level Toxic Metal Exposure in Healthy Weaning-Age Infants: Association with Growth, Dietary Intake, and Iron Deficiency.

Authors:  Jungil Choi; Ju Young Chang; Jeana Hong; Sue Shin; Jeong Su Park; Sohee Oh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Arsenic and Environmental Health: State of the Science and Future Research Opportunities.

Authors:  Danielle J Carlin; Marisa F Naujokas; Karen D Bradham; John Cowden; Michelle Heacock; Heather F Henry; Janice S Lee; David J Thomas; Claudia Thompson; Erik J Tokar; Michael P Waalkes; Linda S Birnbaum; William A Suk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.