Literature DB >> 25089592

Use of medical consultants for hospitalized surgical patients: an observational cohort study.

Lena M Chen1, Adam S Wilk2, Jyothi R Thumma3, John D Birkmeyer4, Mousumi Banerjee5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Payments around episodes of inpatient surgery vary widely among hospitals. As payers move toward bundled payments, understanding sources of variation, including use of medical consultants, is important.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of medical consultations for hospitalized surgical patients, factors associated with use, and practice variation across hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational retrospective cohort study of fee-for-service Medicare patients undergoing colectomy or total hip replacement (THR) between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2010, at US acute care hospitals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number of inpatient medical consultations.
RESULTS: More than half of patients undergoing colectomy (91,684) or THR (339,319) received at least 1 medical consultation while hospitalized (69% and 63%, respectively). Median consultant visits from a medicine physician were 9 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-19) for colectomy and 3 for THR (IQR, 2-5). The likelihood of having at least 1 medical consultation varied widely among hospitals (interquartile range [IQR], 50%-91% for colectomy and 36%-90% for THR). For colectomy, settings associated with greater use included nonteaching (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 1.14 [95% CI, 1.04-1.26]) and for-profit (ARR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.20]). Variation in use of medical consultations was greater for colectomy patients without complications (IQR, 47%-79%) compared with those with complications (IQR, 90%-95%). Results stratified by complications were similar for THR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of medical consultations varied widely across hospitals, particularly for surgical patients without complications. Understanding the value of medical consultations will be important as hospitals prepare for bundled payments and strive to enhance efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25089592      PMCID: PMC4214147          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  22 in total

1.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  T H Lee; E R Marcantonio; C M Mangione; E J Thomas; C A Polanczyk; E F Cook; D J Sugarbaker; M C Donaldson; R Poss; K K Ho; L E Ludwig; A Pedan; L Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Update in perioperative medicine.

Authors:  Steven L Cohn; Gerald W Smetana
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  What's the Risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression.

Authors:  Lawrence C Kleinman; Edward C Norton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Ten commandments for effective consultations.

Authors:  L Goldman; T Lee; P Rudd
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1983-09

5.  Identifying complications of care using administrative data.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; J Daley; T Heeren; S M Foley; E S Fisher; C Duncan; J S Hughes; G A Coffman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program.

Authors:  S N Weingart; L I Iezzoni; R B Davis; R H Palmer; M Cahalane; M B Hamel; K Mukamal; R S Phillips; D T Davies; N J Banks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Grace A Lin; R Adams Dudley; F L Lucas; David J Malenka; Eric Vittinghoff; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Opportunity missed: medical consultation, resource use, and quality of care of patients undergoing major surgery.

Authors:  Andrew D Auerbach; Mladen A Rasic; Neil Sehgal; Brigid Ide; Betsy Stone; Judith Maselli
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-26

9.  Medical and surgical comanagement after elective hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeanne M Huddleston; Kirsten Hall Long; James M Naessens; David Vanness; Dirk Larson; Robert Trousdale; Matt Plevak; Miguel Cabanela; Duane Ilstrup; Robert M Wachter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Hospital factors and racial disparities in mortality after surgery for breast and colon cancer.

Authors:  Tara M Breslin; Arden M Morris; Niya Gu; Sandra L Wong; Emily V Finlayson; Mousumi Banerjee; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hospital readmission rates following primary total hip arthroplasty: present and future in sight.

Authors:  José Lamo-Espinosa; Elena Pascual-Roquet Jalmar
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

2.  Variation in Inpatient Consultation Among Older Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Jennifer P Stevens; David Nyweide; Sha Maresh; Alan Zaslavsky; William Shrank; Michael D Howell; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Impact of processes of care aimed at complication reduction on the cost of complex cancer surgery.

Authors:  Marah N Short; Vivian Ho; Thomas A Aloia
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.454

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.