Yueh-Chang Lee1, Po-Jen Yang, Yuxin Zhong, Thomas E Clancy, Ming-Tsan Lin, Jiping Wang. 1. *Harvard School of Public Health §Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital ∥Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA †Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan ‡Cancer Hospital & Cancer Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: On the basis of SEER data, in which most gastric cancer patients had limited lymph node dissection, node ratio-based staging system (TNrM) has been shown to have better accuracy than the AJCC TNM system. This study is to validate the result with patients from Taiwan, where D2 lymphadenectomy is routinely performed. PATIENT AND METHOD: A total of 1405 consecutive gastric cancer patients treated at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1998 and 2010 were included. To evaluate the performance of the AJCC system, each TNM stage was stratified by TNrM stages. The homogeneity of patients' survival across TNrM strata was evaluated using the log-rank test. The performance of the TNrM system was evaluated with the same approach. RESULTS: Five of the 7 evaluable AJCC stages (IA, IIA, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC) contained TNrM subgroups with statistically heterogenous survival (P=0.003, 0.04, 0.002, 0.04, and <0.001, respectively). Thirty-six percent of patients (506/1405) were misclassified by the AJCC TNM system. However, of the assessable 6 TNrM stages, none of the AJCC subgroups showed significantly heterogenous survivals (P>0.05). About 19% of patients (264/1405) were misclassified by using the TNrM system. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node ratio significantly decreases the stage migration caused by inadequate examined lymph nodes. The advantage of TNrM was validated with a patient cohort from the Eastern medical center.
BACKGROUND: On the basis of SEER data, in which most gastric cancerpatients had limited lymph node dissection, node ratio-based staging system (TNrM) has been shown to have better accuracy than the AJCC TNM system. This study is to validate the result with patients from Taiwan, where D2 lymphadenectomy is routinely performed. PATIENT AND METHOD: A total of 1405 consecutive gastric cancerpatients treated at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1998 and 2010 were included. To evaluate the performance of the AJCC system, each TNM stage was stratified by TNrM stages. The homogeneity of patients' survival across TNrM strata was evaluated using the log-rank test. The performance of the TNrM system was evaluated with the same approach. RESULTS: Five of the 7 evaluable AJCC stages (IA, IIA, IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC) contained TNrM subgroups with statistically heterogenous survival (P=0.003, 0.04, 0.002, 0.04, and <0.001, respectively). Thirty-six percent of patients (506/1405) were misclassified by the AJCC TNM system. However, of the assessable 6 TNrM stages, none of the AJCC subgroups showed significantly heterogenous survivals (P>0.05). About 19% of patients (264/1405) were misclassified by using the TNrM system. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node ratio significantly decreases the stage migration caused by inadequate examined lymph nodes. The advantage of TNrM was validated with a patient cohort from the Eastern medical center.
Authors: Fabio Bagante; Thuy Tran; Gaya Spolverato; Andrea Ruzzenente; Stefan Buttner; Cecilia G Ethun; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Simone Conci; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Jan N M IJzermans; Shishir K Maithel; George Poultsides; Alfredo Guglielmi; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Sung Hwan Hwang; Hyun Il Kim; Jun Seong Song; Min Hong Lee; Sung Joon Kwon; Min Gyu Kim Journal: J Gastric Cancer Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 3.720
Authors: Hye In Kim; Tae Hyuk Kim; Jun-Ho Choe; Jung-Han Kim; Jee Soo Kim; Young Lyun Oh; Soo Yeon Hahn; Jung Hee Shin; Hye Won Jang; Young Nam Kim; Hosu Kim; Hyeon Seon Ahn; Kyunga Kim; Sun Wook Kim; Jae Hoon Chung Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.452