Hisao Nagata1. 1. The Institute for Science of Labour, Japan.
Abstract
Considering a fatal case of an aged individual, who died due to falling down stairs, the cause of the fatal fall was investigated through experiments. A witness, who was with the victim, when the fatal accident occurred, stated that the aged individual had miss-footed, lost balance at the top of the stairs, and fell accidently from an upper floor to a lower floor. It was very questionable whether or not this witness's statements were true. The true cause of the fatal fall was unclear, because of the witness's inconsistent statements, which showed discrepancies between the initial and later statements. The cause of a fatal fall can be presumed from external and internal damages to the body and other circumstantial evidences. But it was difficult to prove the true cause of a fatal fall only from the results of the autopsy and investigation of circumstantial evidences. The author was officially requested to conduct experiments to elucidate possible falling patterns. Judging from the experimental results, deep questions about the witness's statements arose. These experimental methods and analyses in this paper could be applied to elucidate possible falling patterns of fatal falls from stairs where the fatal causes are controversial.
Considering a fatal case of an aged individual, who died due to falling down stairs, the cause of the fatal fall was investigated through experiments. A witness, who was with the victim, when the fatal accident occurred, stated that the aged individual had miss-footed, lost balance at the top of the stairs, and fell accidently from an upper floor to a lower floor. It was very questionable whether or not this witness's statements were true. The true cause of the fatal fall was unclear, because of the witness's inconsistent statements, which showed discrepancies between the initial and later statements. The cause of a fatal fall can be presumed from external and internal damages to the body and other circumstantial evidences. But it was difficult to prove the true cause of a fatal fall only from the results of the autopsy and investigation of circumstantial evidences. The author was officially requested to conduct experiments to elucidate possible falling patterns. Judging from the experimental results, deep questions about the witness's statements arose. These experimental methods and analyses in this paper could be applied to elucidate possible falling patterns of fatal falls from stairs where the fatal causes are controversial.
According to the mortality statistics classified by the International Classification of
Diseases recommended by the WHO-World Health Organization, 1,917 deaths due to falls on/from
stairs and steps in the United States in 20071), 693 deaths in England and Wales in 20112), and 679 deaths in Japan in 20123). Many researchers have undertaken demographic or
epidemiological surveys for stair related injuries4,5,6,7). As far as the author
surveyed past literatures, an experimental article for a fatal fall based on the autopsy
results and detailed configurations of stairs, where a fatal fall occurred, was not found in
past research papers. Most fatal falls from stairs are caused by serious head injuries5, 6, 8). Whenever a fatal stair-accident occurs, the
actual duration time until receiving the first impact by falling down the stairs is within a
second, according to the author’s experiments9, 10). Because of the instantaneous occurrence
of a stair fall, it is very difficult to find a witness who sees the entire falling patterns
down stairs.In the case of no witnesses, the cause of a fatal fall can be sometimes determined from
external injuries on the corpse and circumstantial evidence. Computer simulation can be used
to determine the possible falling patterns, nevertheless, these simulated results are likely
to be largely influenced by initial input parameters, and are not always reliable to
identify the specific decisive causes of actual fatal falls. Taking one fatal case of an
aged individual, who died of severe head injuries, due to a fall down the stairs at a
residential home, the cause of that fatal fall was investigated. Only one witness was with
the victim when the fatal accident occurred. It was questionable whether or not the
witness’s comments were true. The fatal fall was examined using a dummy and experimental
stairs with the same configurations, such as the dimensions of the tread rise etc. From the
analyses of the experimental falls by a dummy from stairs, serious questions about the
witness’s statements arose.
Conditions of the Fatal Fall
Statements by people specifically involved in this investigation
It was reported that one aged individual fell from the top of the stairs at victim’s
home. According to the initial on-site statements of the witness, the aged victim had
accidentally miss-footed, lost balance at the top of the stairs, and fell from an upper to
a lower floor. But strong doubts arose from statements by the rescue crew members. They
found broken debris scattered around the top of the stairs just after arrival at the
victim’s home. When they questioned as to what happened, the witness confessed to have had
a quarrel with the victim at the upper floor near the entrance to the stairs. The witness
implied that witness slightly pushed the aged victim just before the occurrence of
fall-incident in witness’s first comments. Judging from the suspicious circumstantial
appearances, the rescue crew members speculated that some sort of skirmish had occurred
and about the possibilities of violent action such as shoving the victim near the upper
stairs might have occurred. They reported this information to the regional police office.
Several policemen soon came and questioned the witness on-site. They suspected the
witness’s explanation because of inconsistent statements and indications that the aged
victim was shoved at the top of stairs. After retaining attorneys, the suspect stated that
the victim fell down from the top of the stairs accidentally and completely denied the
initial statements that the witness gave external forces to the aged victim, and exercised
one’s own constitutional right to remain silent during the public prosecutors’
interrogations. The public prosecutors were undermined as to the true cause of the fatal
fall.
Physical conditions
Based on a detailed search warrant of the actual stairs, an inspection was conducted by
public inspectors, police officers and the author as shown in Fig. 1. The wooden stairs were 177 cm long and 264 cm high. The stairs with width of 90 cm
consisted of 12 steps with a tread of 16.6 cm and a rise of 22.0 cm except for the top
step, which had a tread of 23.0 cm and a rise of 25.0 cm with non-slip vinyl edge of the
step. The incline of stairs was 53 degrees except for the top part of the
stairs which was 47 degrees. A handrail was installed at one side wall of stairs with the
height of around 70 cm from the step edge. The heights from the landing of the 1st floor
to the overhang above stairs was 207 cm.
Fig. 1.
Survey of the actual stairs. (a) View from the upper stairs (b) Incline of the
stairs.
Survey of the actual stairs. (a) View from the upper stairs (b) Incline of the
stairs.
Autopsy of the victim
The victim died two days after the fall. According to the results of the autopsy, the
occipital area of the head and the top of the left shoulder bones were severely fractured,
and the author illustrated outline drawings from the detailed results of autopsy as shown
in Fig. 2. A clear ellipse-shaped impact blow mark could be seen on the occipital area of the
head, and bruises at the right backward side of lumber areas were observed. It was
apparent that the victim fell backward from stairs and the occipital area of the head was
strongly impacted on a solid flat surface. The major fatal causes of death were by the
fracture of the skull and intracranial injuries. Several rib bones could have broken while
giving manual resuscitation. But it was inconceivable that ellipse-shaped reddish
congestions in the upper front part of the left breast would be observed, if the victim
fell backwards from the stairs.
Fig. 2.
External injuries. ① Severe impact blow marks on the occipital area of the head
with skull fractures, ② Severe impact blow marks with fracture of left upper
shoulder, ③ Fracture to the left little finger, ④ Fractures of right frontal rim
bones, ⑤ Fractures of right back rim bones, ⑥ Bruise marks on lumber area.
External injuries. ① Severe impact blow marks on the occipital area of the head
with skull fractures, ② Severe impact blow marks with fracture of left upper
shoulder, ③ Fracture to the left little finger, ④ Fractures of right frontal rim
bones, ⑤ Fractures of right back rim bones, ⑥ Bruise marks on lumber area.
Methods
Falling patterns
According to the author’s previous investigations of the actual backward fall experiments
from stairs9) and by using a dummy on the
level surface10), it was observed that
the first impact to the back of the head caused the most crucial injury within a second,
as it kept rolling down to the lower floor. In these experiments, the focus was placed on
the head impact blows just after the backward fall. These actual falling patterns were
examined to determine the possible falling patterns to cause such fatal head injuries.
Various possible falling patterns were analyzed in case of a natural fall and intentional
falls. Each falling pattern was recorded by a high speed camera at the rate of 240fps
(Type: Casio EX-FH25). Each of the following three major experiments were conducted
once.1. Natural fall assuming an unintentional fall- A backward facing dummy was supported in an upright posture at the end of top of
stairs, and was leaned backward at a very slow speed until it fell naturally by itself
without external forces.2. Intentional fall assuming a fall from shoving at a standing-still posture- A backward facing standing dummy was intensively shoved by an adult at the end of top
of stairs.3. Intentional fall assuming a fall from shoving during a stepping-back posture- A backward standing dummy on a thin wheeled platform was moved at the speed of
1.6 km/h, and was intensively shoved by an adult at the end of top of stairs.
A dummy and mock-up of the stairs
To extrapolate the possible falling patterns of the victim from stairs, a dummy, and
model of a head and mock-up stairs with the similar configuration of the actual stairs
were prepared. The dummy’s weight was 64 kg, and the height was 150 cm, approximately the
same weight and dimensional configurations of the victim as shown in Fig. 3. The major structure of the dummy was steel covered with urethane.
Consequently, each arthro of a dummy was immobilized except for the shoulder joints. The
center of gravity of each limb and the whole body weight were adjusted by the insertion of
lead or iron inside the dummy. A model clay head with the similar dimensional
configurations as the victims was made as shown in Fig.
4. This model clay head was used to search for the impact point determined from
actual steep dimensional configurations of tread and rise prior to conducting the
experiments. Mock-up stairs were made of wooden materials supported by steel scaffoldings
as shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 3.
Dummy.
Fig. 4.
Model clay head.
Fig. 5.
Mock-up of the stairs. (a) View from the anterior side of stairs, (b) View from the
top of stairs
Dummy.Model clay head.Mock-up of the stairs. (a) View from the anterior side of stairs, (b) View from the
top of stairs
Analyses and Results
Analysis of external injuries
A model clay head with the similar dimensions to the victim’s head was utilized to check
the damage points of injuries on the step. Assuming that the first blow impact to the back
of the head occurred on the tread surface or at the step edge, traced marks of external
injuries on the back of the head were observed such as planar injuries at the parietal
area of the head as shown in Fig. 6a or linear injuries in the occipital area of the head as shown in Fig. 6b. A dummy, whose head was
covered with paper coated with pressure sensitive red-dye, was shoved over the step. Red
scars were observed at the parietal area of the head as shown in Fig. 7. Actual fatal impact injuries of the victim formed an ellipse-shaped blow mark in
the occipital area of the head.
Fig. 6.
Predicted injuries to the head on the tread and the step edge. (a) Planar injuries
at the parietal area of the back of head, (b) Linear injuries in the occipital area
of the head
Fig. 7.
Damage observed on the parietal area of the dummy in the case of impact on the
tread.
Predicted injuries to the head on the tread and the step edge. (a) Planar injuries
at the parietal area of the back of head, (b) Linear injuries in the occipital area
of the headDamage observed on the parietal area of the dummy in the case of impact on the
tread.
Analysis of falling pattern
The dummy’s head impacted on the fourth step from the lower landing in case of natural
fall without any external forces as shown in Fig.
8a. The dummy’s head impacted on the third step from the lower landing, in case of
external force toward standing still posture as shown in Fig. 8b. The dummy’s head impacted on the second step from the
lower landing, in case of shoving a moving dummy at the constant speed of 1.6 km/h as
shown in Fig. 8c. According to every result of
experimental falls using a dummy, the dummy hit its head on the step in every experiment.
The aged victim fell backwards and was clear that the occipital area of the head
intensively impacted on the flat surface, such as the lower landing, judging from evidence
of the autopsy, which showed the ellipse-shaped injuries on the occipital area of the
head. Analyzing these results of experiments even in the intentional case of shoving it
with moving backwards, the back of the head of the dummy did not impact on the lower
landing, but on the tread surface.
Fig. 8.
The first impact points to the head on the steps. (a) Natural fall, (b) Shoving a
standing dummy, (c) Shoving a moving dummy.
The first impact points to the head on the steps. (a) Natural fall, (b) Shoving a
standing dummy, (c) Shoving a moving dummy.
Discussion
From the experiments and autopsy, it was apparent that the fatal victim fell backwards and
struck the occipital area of the victim’s head not on the step, but on a flat surface such
as the lower flat landing, and that the victim was shoved from the top of stairs by
intensive external force in the case of the fatal fall initiated around the top of the
stairs. Judging from ellipse-shaped reddish congestions in the upper front part of the left
breast were observed by the results of the autopsy, another criminal scenario can be
considered to give intensive external forces to the victim, while beginning to descend a few
steps below from the top of stairs. These speculations pointed out the fact that the upper
left breast of victim was kicked strongly as shown in Fig. 9. It seems to be difficult to kick strongly on the upper breast on the first and
second step as shown in Fig. 9a. The suspect could
kick the victim’s upper breast strongly on the left breast by a right foot, presumably when
the victim was standing on the second or third step from the top of stairs as shown in Fig. 9b or
9c. The victim would likely fall and impact directly near the lower landing, and
hit the occipital area of victim’s head severely as shown in Fig. 10.
Fig. 9.
Possible falling patterns from intentional kicks.
Fig. 10.
Possible head impact on the lower landing.
Possible falling patterns from intentional kicks.Possible head impact on the lower landing.
Conclusion
Form the experimental results, it is very unnatural that the occipital area of the head of
the fatal victim was strongly impacted on the flat surface like a lower landing without an
external stronger force. The ellipse-shaped reddish contusions on the upper front part of
the left breast were considered to be caused not by drop impacts, but by an intentionally
strong kick. The only witness stated that the victim fell down from the top of the stairs
without any external forces. According to the experimental analyses of actual falls of a
dummy from stairs and observations of fatal head injuries, it is very suspicious that the
victim had accidentally missteps, lost balance at the top of the stairs, and fell from an
upper to a lower floor. These experimental methods and analyses could be applied to
elucidate possible falling patterns of fatal falls from stairs where the fatal causes are
controversial.