Lindsay K Sween1, Andrew D Althouse2, James M Roberts3. 1. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. 2. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: jroberts@mwri.magee.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify differences of early-pregnancy body fat percentage and body mass index (BMI) between obese women that experienced preeclampsia and those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an analysis of the Prenatal Exposures and Preeclampsia Prevention 3 longitudinal cohort study of preeclampsia mechanisms in obese and overweight women. Women completed questionnaires regarding their health behaviors; had hematocrit level, weight and height, and waist and hip circumferences measured, and had resistance and reactance measured by bioelectric impedance analysis machine during the first, second, and third trimesters. Total body water, fat mass, and percent body fat were calculated with the use of pregnancy-specific formulas. Preeclampsia was assessed with the clinical definition and a research definition (clinical preeclampsia plus hyperuricemia). Logistic regression models were constructed to analyze early-pregnancy BMI and body fat percentage (measured at 10.2 ± 3.0 weeks of gestation) as predictors of preeclampsia outcomes. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-three women were included in the analysis: 30 women had preeclampsia by clinical definition (8.0%), and 14 women had preeclampsia by the research definition (3.8%). There was no relationship between BMI and preeclampsia risk in obese women; however, body fat percentage was associated significantly with increased risk of both the clinical definition of preeclampsia and the research definition. In 239 obese women, a 1% increase in body fat was associated with approximately 12% increased odds of clinical preeclampsia and 24% increased risk of preeclampsia by the research definition. CONCLUSION: Early-pregnancy body fat appears to be important in the pathophysiologic condition of preeclampsia in obese women.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify differences of early-pregnancy body fat percentage and body mass index (BMI) between obesewomen that experienced preeclampsia and those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an analysis of the Prenatal Exposures and Preeclampsia Prevention 3 longitudinal cohort study of preeclampsia mechanisms in obese and overweight women. Women completed questionnaires regarding their health behaviors; had hematocrit level, weight and height, and waist and hip circumferences measured, and had resistance and reactance measured by bioelectric impedance analysis machine during the first, second, and third trimesters. Total body water, fat mass, and percent body fat were calculated with the use of pregnancy-specific formulas. Preeclampsia was assessed with the clinical definition and a research definition (clinical preeclampsia plus hyperuricemia). Logistic regression models were constructed to analyze early-pregnancy BMI and body fat percentage (measured at 10.2 ± 3.0 weeks of gestation) as predictors of preeclampsia outcomes. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-three women were included in the analysis: 30 women had preeclampsia by clinical definition (8.0%), and 14 women had preeclampsia by the research definition (3.8%). There was no relationship between BMI and preeclampsia risk in obesewomen; however, body fat percentage was associated significantly with increased risk of both the clinical definition of preeclampsia and the research definition. In 239 obesewomen, a 1% increase in body fat was associated with approximately 12% increased odds of clinical preeclampsia and 24% increased risk of preeclampsia by the research definition. CONCLUSION: Early-pregnancy body fat appears to be important in the pathophysiologic condition of preeclampsia in obesewomen.
Authors: Juliana S Powell; Robin E Gandley; Emily Lackner; Andrea Dolinish; Yingshi Ouyang; Robert W Powers; Adrian E Morelli; Carl A Hubel; Yoel Sadovsky Journal: Pregnancy Hypertens Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 2.494
Authors: Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Adi L Tarca; Edi Vaisbuch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Nandor Gabor Than; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Zhong Dong; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero Journal: J Perinat Med Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 1.901
Authors: Bo Zhang; M Yvonne Kim; GiNell Elliot; Yan Zhou; Guangfeng Zhao; Daofeng Li; Rebecca F Lowdon; Matthew Gormley; Mirhan Kapidzic; Joshua F Robinson; Michael T McMaster; Chibo Hong; Tali Mazor; Emily Hamilton; Renee L Sears; Erica C Pehrsson; Marco A Marra; Steven J M Jones; Misha Bilenky; Martin Hirst; Ting Wang; Joseph F Costello; Susan J Fisher Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Sarah L McLennan; Amanda Henry; Lynne M Roberts; Sai S Siritharan; Melissa Ojurovic; Amanda Yao; Gregory K Davis; George Mangos; Franziska Pettit; Mark A Brown; Anthony J O'Sullivan Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Edi Vaisbuch; Adi L Tarca; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Nandor Gabor Than; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Zhong Dong; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 3.240