Literature DB >> 25088674

Determinants of nocebo effect during oral drug provocation tests.

S Bavbek1, Ö Aydın2, Z Ç Sözener2, S Yüksel3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A "nocebo" effect is defined as troublesome symptoms after the administration of placebo. The aim of this study was to determine characteristics of nocebo responses and related factors.
METHODS: Patients with a reliable history of drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions subjected to placebo-controlled oral drug provocation tests and reacted to placebo, were consecutively included in this case-control study. Controls consisted of the randomly selected subjects who had a history of drug hypersensitivity reaction but did not react to placebo. A structured questionnaire was performed by an allergy specialist.
RESULTS: There were 137 subjects (mean age: 43.10 ± 12.65 years), with nocebo and 91 subjects (42.38 ± 12.18 years) without any reaction to placebo. Most nocebo reactions (71.5%, n=98) were classified as subjective, with local pruritus as the most common finding. A minority of nocebo reactions (11.7%, n=16) were objective as cutaneous reactions including flushing and urticaria. Factors related with nocebo risks were university graduation (OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 1.27-6.93, p=0.012) and non-atopy (OR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.02-4.40, p=0.043). In terms of the time of first and last historical reaction to drugs, each 1-unit (a month) increase in first reaction time (OR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, p=0.001) and last reaction time (OR: 1.019, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, p<0.001) were associated with increased nocebo risk.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, subjects with high education, non-atopy, and older drug hypersensitivity reactions history seem to be more likely to experience nocebo effect during oral drug provocation tests. These risk factors should be considered and managed accordingly to complete the drug provocation procedure successfully.
Copyright © 2014 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug allergy; Hypersensitivity; Nocebo; Oral drug provocation test; Placebo response

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25088674     DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2014.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)        ISSN: 0301-0546            Impact factor:   1.667


  6 in total

1.  Nocebo effect in randomized clinical trials of antidepressants in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Johanna Carolina Rojas-Mirquez; Milton Jose Max Rodriguez-Zuñiga; Francisco Javier Bonilla-Escobar; Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo; Mike Petkov; Lino Becerra; David Borsook; Clas Linnman
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 2.  Pro and Contra: Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Ozge Soyer; Umit Murat Sahiner; Bulent Enis Sekerel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Medicine-related beliefs predict attribution of symptoms to a sham medicine: A prospective study.

Authors:  Rebecca K Webster; John Weinman; G James Rubin
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-02-05

4.  The sustained influence of prior experience induced by social observation on placebo and nocebo responses.

Authors:  Huijuan Zhang; Lili Zhou; Hua Wei; Xuejing Lu; Li Hu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 5.  The Clinical Implications of Nocebo Effects for Biosimilar Therapy.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Remo Panaccione; T Kevin Murphy
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Nocebo-Prone Behaviour in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  George E Fragoulis; Gerasimos Evangelatos; Aikaterini Arida; Vasiliki-Kalliopi Bournia; Kalliopi Fragiadaki; Anastasios Karamanakos; Evrydiki Kravvariti; Katerina Laskari; Stylianos Panopoulos; Maria Pappa; Dimos D Mitsikostas; Maria G Tektonidou; Petros P Sfikakis
Journal:  Mediterr J Rheumatol       Date:  2020-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.