Literature DB >> 2508848

Short term outcome in babies refused perinatal intensive care.

H Sidhu1, R N Heasley, C C Patterson, H L Halliday, W Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mortality in babies refused admission to a regional perinatal centre with that in babies accepted for intensive care in the centre.
DESIGN: Retrospective study with group comparison.
SETTING: Based at the Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, with follow up of patients in all obstetric units in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS: Requests for transfer of 675 babies to the regional perinatal centre (prenatally and postnatally) were made from hospitals in Northern Ireland between January 1984 and December 1986. In all, 343 babies were refused admission to the centre, and complete data were available for 332 of them. These babies were either admitted to other neonatal intensive care units (261 babies) or remained in hospitals with only special care cots (71 babies). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Short term mortality.
RESULTS: Seventy of the 332 babies refused admission to the centre died compared with 51 of the 333 who were admitted. Multivariate analysis based on a logistic model showed a non-significant increase in mortality among babies treated in other intensive care units compared with babies treated in the centre (relative odds 1.2; 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 1.9). The increase in mortality in babies who remained in a special care baby unit, however, was significant (3.5; 1.7 to 7.0). This increase was particularly significant in babies born at less than or equal to 32 weeks' gestation and who weighed less than 1500 g (8.4; 2.5 to 28.1).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study confirm the benefits of neonatal intensive care and its particular value in improving survival in babies of low birth weight. As the babies were refused admission to the regional perinatal centre because intensive care cots were not available this deficiency should be corrected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship; Royal Maternity Hospital

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508848      PMCID: PMC1837594          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6700.647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Where should low birthweight babies be born?

Authors:  R Cooke
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-18

2.  Regional neonatal intensive care: bias and benefit.

Authors:  T G Powell; P O Pharoah
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-09-19

3.  Referrals to a regional neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  H P Roper; M L Chiswick; D G Sims
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Outcome for newborn babies declined admission to a regional neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  D G Sims; J Wynn; M L Chiswick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Referral of mothers and infants for intensive care.

Authors:  A M Blake; M J Pollitzer; E O Reynolds
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-08-18

6.  Prediction of outcome shortly after delivery for the very low birthweight (less than or equal to 1500 g) infant.

Authors:  C C Patterson; H L Halliday
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Transfer before delivery on Merseyside: an analysis of the first 140 patients.

Authors:  M O Lobb; M E Morgan; A P Bond; R W Cooke
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-04
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Survival and place of treatment after premature delivery.

Authors:  D Field; S Hodges; E Mason; P Burton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.