Literature DB >> 25087521

Methods for assessing the quality of data in public health information systems: a critical review.

Hong Chen1, Ping Yu1, David Hailey1, Ning Wang2.   

Abstract

The quality of data in public health information systems can be ensured by effective data quality assessment. In order to conduct effective data quality assessment, measurable data attributes have to be precisely defined. Then reliable and valid measurement methods for data attributes have to be used to measure each attribute. We conducted a systematic review of data quality assessment methods for public health using major databases and well-known institutional websites. 35 studies were eligible for inclusion in the study. A total of 49 attributes of data quality were identified from the literature. Completeness, accuracy and timeliness were the three most frequently assessed attributes of data quality. Most studies directly examined data values. This is complemented by exploring either data users' perception or documentation quality. However, there are limitations of current data quality assessment methods: a lack of consensus on attributes measured; inconsistent definition of the data quality attributes; a lack of mixed methods for assessing data quality; and inadequate attention to reliability and validity. Removal of these limitations is an opportunity for further improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25087521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  7 in total

1.  Validation of an Electronic Surgical Outcomes Database at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Anderson; Lenka Ilcisin; Joseph Ngonzi; Stephen Ttendo; Deus Twesigye; Noralis Portal Benitez; Paul Firth; Deepika Nehra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evaluation of the Quality of Online Information for Patients with Rare Cancers: Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Ulrike Kuenzel; Tabea Monga Sindeu; Sarah Schroth; Jutta Huebner; Natalie Herth
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  A Conceptual Framework of Data Readiness: The Contextual Intersection of Quality, Availability, Interoperability, and Provenance.

Authors:  Brian J Douthit; Guilherme Del Fiol; Catherine J Staes; Sharron L Docherty; Rachel L Richesson
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  What's Past is Prologue: A Scoping Review of Recent Public Health and Global Health Informatics Literature.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Jamie Pina; Hadi Kharrazi; Fardad Gharghabi; Janise Richards
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  Impact of the Price of Gifts From Patients on Physicians' Service Quality in Online Consultations: Empirical Study Based on Social Exchange Theory.

Authors:  Yanan Wang; Hong Wu; Chenxi Xia; Naiji Lu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Swiss Validation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Database.

Authors:  Basile Pache; David Martin; Valérie Addor; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013.

Authors:  Ann-Beth Moller; Max Petzold; Doris Chou; Lale Say
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 26.763

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.