Fumie Sakamoto1, Tomoko Sakihama2, Sanjay Saint3, M Todd Greene4, David Ratz5, Yasuharu Tokuda6. 1. Center for Quality Improvement, St Luke's International Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: fumienum@luke.ac.jp. 2. Division of Infection Control and Prevention, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Department of Veterans Affairs/University of Michigan Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of Medicine, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the use of infection prevention practices in Japan. We conducted a nationwide survey to examine the use of recommended infection prevention strategies and factors affecting their use in Japanese hospitals. METHODS: Between April 1, 2012, and January 31, 2013, we surveyed 971 hospitals in Japan. The survey instrument assessed general hospital and infection prevention program characteristics and use of infection prevention practices, including practices specific to preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Logistic regression models were used to examine multivariable associations between hospital characteristics and the use of the various prevention practices. RESULTS: A total of 685 hospitals (71%) responded to the survey. Maintaining aseptic technique during catheter insertion and maintenance, avoiding routine central line changes, and using maximum sterile barrier precautions and semirecumbent positioning were the only practices regularly used by more than one-half of the hospitals to prevent CAUTI, CLABSI, and VAP, respectively. Higher safety-centeredness was associated with regular use of prevention practices across all infection types. CONCLUSIONS: Although certain practices were used commonly, the rate of regular use of many evidence-based prevention practices was low in Japanese hospitals. Our findings highlight the importance of fostering an organization-wide atmosphere that prioritizes patient safety. Such a commitment to patient safety should in turn promote the use of effective measures to reduce health care-associated infections in Japan.
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the use of infection prevention practices in Japan. We conducted a nationwide survey to examine the use of recommended infection prevention strategies and factors affecting their use in Japanese hospitals. METHODS: Between April 1, 2012, and January 31, 2013, we surveyed 971 hospitals in Japan. The survey instrument assessed general hospital and infection prevention program characteristics and use of infection prevention practices, including practices specific to preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Logistic regression models were used to examine multivariable associations between hospital characteristics and the use of the various prevention practices. RESULTS: A total of 685 hospitals (71%) responded to the survey. Maintaining aseptic technique during catheter insertion and maintenance, avoiding routine central line changes, and using maximum sterile barrier precautions and semirecumbent positioning were the only practices regularly used by more than one-half of the hospitals to prevent CAUTI, CLABSI, and VAP, respectively. Higher safety-centeredness was associated with regular use of prevention practices across all infection types. CONCLUSIONS: Although certain practices were used commonly, the rate of regular use of many evidence-based prevention practices was low in Japanese hospitals. Our findings highlight the importance of fostering an organization-wide atmosphere that prioritizes patient safety. Such a commitment to patient safety should in turn promote the use of effective measures to reduce health care-associated infections in Japan.
Authors: M Todd Greene; Stefan P Kuster; Hugo Sax; Peter W Schreiber; Lauren Clack; David Ratz; Sanjay Saint Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Kirsten Brubakk; Martin Veel Svendsen; Ellen Tveter Deilkås; Dag Hofoss; Paul Barach; Ole Tjomsland Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240