Literature DB >> 25087103

Drive-line infections and sepsis in patients receiving the HVAD system as a left ventricular assist device.

Ranjit John1, Keith D Aaronson2, Walter E Pae3, Michael A Acker4, David R Hathaway5, Kevin B Najarian5, Mark S Slaughter6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drive-line infections and sepsis lead to significant morbidity and even mortality in patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs). The HeartWare HVAD system is unique compared with other VAD systems in that it has a thin, flexible drive-line and is implanted directly into the pericardial space without the need for a pump pocket. We reviewed 332 patients receiving the HVAD in the pivotal ADVANCE Bridge to Transplant (BTT) trial and Continued Access Protocol (CAP) to determine the incidence of drive-line infections and sepsis.
METHODS: Summary statistics of outcomes and Kaplan-Meier freedom-from-event analyses were performed. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for homogeneity was used to determine whether there was any site effect on rates of either drive-line exit-site or sepsis infections.
RESULTS: Drive-line exit-site infections occurred in 16.9% (56 of 332) of patients (0.25 event per patient-year [EPPY]). These infections were primarily treated with antibiotics and most occurred >30 days post-implant (88%, or 66 of 75 drive-line infections). Sepsis occurred in 17.2% (57 of 332) of patients (0.23 EPPY), and sepsis events occurred more frequently >30 days post-implant (86%, or 60 of 70 sepsis events). Of patients with sepsis, 17.5% (10 of 57) died due to sepsis-related neurologic events (7 of 10) and multisystem organ failure (2 of 10) and cardiopulmonary failure (1 of 10), whereas there were no deaths related to drive-line infections. In addition, 17.5% (10 of 57) of patients had a stroke event while under treatment for sepsis (7 hemorrhagic and 3 ischemic strokes), and 3.5% (2 of 57 patients with sepsis) had a device exchange for VAD thrombus (4 days before and 1 day after sepsis diagnosis). Patients with drive-line infections or sepsis had a larger body mass index compared to those without infection (29.4 vs 27.6 kg/m(2), p = 0.015), and were more frequently diabetic (43.7% vs 31.2%, p = 0.034). Although there was no negative impact on survival in patients with drive-line exit-site infections, there was a trend for reduced survival in patients with sepsis events when compared to those patients without sepsis.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of drive-line infection and sepsis was low in patients receiving the HVAD pump. Despite a trend toward reduced survival in patients with sepsis events, the overall survival of patients with either drive-line infections or sepsis was excellent.
Copyright © 2014 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drive-line infection; heart failure; infection; mechanical support; sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25087103     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  22 in total

1.  Impact of Obesity on Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes.

Authors:  Abhishek Jaiswal; Lauren K Truby; Astha Chichra; Rashmi Jain; Leann Myers; Nirav Patel; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 5.712

2.  Left ventricular assist devices exchange: why, when and how to do it-experience from experts.

Authors:  Bastian Schmack; Anton Sabashnikov; Alexander Weymann; Mohamed Zeriouh; Achim Koch; Arjang Ruhparwar; Andre Ruediger Simon; Aron Frederik Popov
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Diagnosis of infection in patients with left ventricular assist device: PET or SPECT?

Authors:  Damien Legallois; Alain Manrique
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Delayed febrile response with bloodstream infections in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Christopher A Wrobel; Mark H Drazner; Colby R Ayers; David D Pham; Ricardo M La Hoz; Justin L Grodin; Sonia Garg; Pradeep P A Mammen; Robert M Morlend; Faris Araj; Alpesh A Amin; William K Cornwell; Jennifer T Thibodeau
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Omar M Abu Saleh; John M Stulak; Mark P Wilhelm; Larry M Baddour; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18

7.  Correlation between driveline features and driveline infection in left ventricular assist device selection.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Takahide Murasawa; Hironori Kawasaki; Koichi Kashiwa; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 8.  Left ventricular assist device driveline infections: recent advances and future goals.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Leuck
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  18F-FDG PET/CT-imaging of left ventricular assist device infection: a retrospective quantitative intrapatient analysis.

Authors:  Philipp Kanapinn; Wolfgang Burchert; Hermann Körperich; Jan Körfer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Left ventricular assist device driveline infections in three contemporary devices.

Authors:  Thomas Schlöglhofer; Peter Michalovics; Julia Riebandt; Philipp Angleitner; Martin Stoiber; Günther Laufer; Heinrich Schima; Dominik Wiedemann; Daniel Zimpfer; Francesco Moscato
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.