Literature DB >> 25086993

Clinico-pathology and prognosis of endometrial cancer in patients previously treated for breast cancer, with or without tamoxifen: a comparative study in 363 patients.

C Ngô1, C Brugier2, C Plancher3, A de la Rochefordière4, S Alran2, J G Féron2, C Malhaire5, S Scholl6, X Sastre7, R Rouzier2, V Fourchotte2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinic-pathologic variables and the prognosis of endometrial cancer in patients with and without previous breast cancer, with and without Tamoxifen.
METHODS: We analyzed patients treated for an endometrial carcinoma from 1994 to 2004: patients without breast cancer (group 1), patients with a previous breast cancer without tamoxifen (group 2) and patients treated for breast cancer with tamoxifen (group 3). Survival rates were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a Log rank test, multivariate analysis was performed with a Cox regression model.
RESULTS: 363 patients were analyzed. 80 patients had a previous history of breast cancer (43 received tamoxifen). Although it was not statistically significant, more carcinosarcomas were observed in patients in group 3 than patients in groups 1 and 2 (11.7% versus 4.2% and 5.4% respectively, p = 0.17).) Median follow-up was 87 months [2-185]. 5-year overall survival rate was respectively in groups 1, 2 and 3: 82%, 73.2%, and 61% (p = 0.0006). 5-year local relapse-free survival rate was respectively: 95.9%, 93.1% and 82.5% (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, factors affecting overall survival rate were: age ≥65 ans (HR 3.62, p < 0.0001), FIGO stage (HR 3.33 p < 0.0001 for locally advanced stage versus early stage, HR 8.87 p = 0.03 for distant extension versus early stage), and group 3 (HR 2.83 p < 0.001 versus group 1).
CONCLUSION: Patients with endometrial cancer previously treated for breast cancer show a worse prognostic, particularly if they reveived tamoxifen.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Endometrial cancer; Prognosis of endometrial cancer; Tamoxifen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086993     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

1.  Elevated risks of subsequent endometrial cancer development among breast cancer survivors with different hormone receptor status: a SEER analysis.

Authors:  Jieqiong Liu; Wen Jiang; Kai Mao; Yi An; Fengxi Su; Betty Y S Kim; Qiang Liu; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Event-free survival following early endometrial events in breast cancer patients treated with anti-hormonal therapy: A nationwide claims data study.

Authors:  Yura Lee; Yu Rang Park; Hae Reong Kim; Jong Won Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  An Efficacious Endometrial Sampler for Screening Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Lu Han; Jiang Du; Lanbo Zhao; Chao Sun; Qi Wang; Xiaoqian Tuo; Huilian Hou; Yu Liu; Qing Wang; Qurat Ulain; Shulan Lv; Guanjun Zhang; Qing Song; Qiling Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Can ovarian aging be delayed by pharmacological strategies?

Authors:  Jinjin Zhang; Qian Chen; Dingfu Du; Tong Wu; Jingyi Wen; Meng Wu; Yan Zhang; Wei Yan; Su Zhou; Yan Li; Yan Jin; Aiyue Luo; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Risk and prognostic factors for endometrial carcinoma after diagnosis of breast or Lynch-associated cancers-A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Sharon E Johnatty; Colin J R Stewart; Deborah Smith; Daniel Buchanan; Yee Leung; Martin K Oehler; Alison Brand; Penelope M Webb; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.