Literature DB >> 25086899

Five-year follow-up of minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) versus conventional computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) - A population matched study.

R S Khakha1, M Chowdhry2, M Norris2, A Kheiran2, N Patel2, S K Chauhan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has perceived advantages in the early post-operative stage such as reduced blood loss, decreased pain, earlier return to function and earlier discharge. The aim of our study was to confirm that longer term clinical outcome of TKA is not compromised when MIS is combined with computer assisted surgery.
METHODS: Eighty patients matched for age, gender, pre-operative Knee Society Score (KSS) and mechanical axis were prospectively studied. Forty patients underwent minimally invasive computer assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICATKA) and 40 patients underwent conventional computer assisted TKA (CATKA). Functional scores were determined at 6 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and 5 years post-surgery. Long-leg alignment views were obtained 3 months post-operatively.
RESULTS: KSSs in the short term were significantly better in the MICATKA group than in the CATKA group (p<000.1). Tourniquet-time was 58 min in the MICTKA group and 60 min in the CATKA group (p=0.3). Straight leg raise was achieved by day one in 93% of the MICATKA group compared to 30% of the CATKA group (p<0.001). Length of stay for the MICATKA group has a mean of 3.25 days and a mean of 6 days for the CATKA group (p<0.001). KSSs up to 2-years were significantly better in the MICTKA group (p<0.001). At 5-years there was no significant difference in KSSs (p=0.46) in the MICATKA and CATKA groups.
CONCLUSION: We confirm that the use of navigation in minimally invasive TKA permits a number of early post-operative advantages and that longer-term functional outcome is not compromised with its usage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer navigation; Minimally invasive; TKR

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086899     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  Navigation in TKA surgery - Evolutionary technique or blind alley?

Authors:  Heiko Graichen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-06

2.  Handheld Navigation Device and Patient-Specific Cutting Guides Result in Similar Coronal Alignment for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael E Steinhaus; Alexander S McLawhorn; Shawn S Richardson; Patrick Maher; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-02-29

3.  Education, engagement and provision of empathy by trained counselor enhances the patient satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe; Ravi Vinod Shah; Pritesh Omprakash Agrawal; Jehangir Malcolm Pestonji; Shubhankar Sanjay Londhe; Maulik Kiranbhai Langaliya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-23

Review 4.  Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results.

Authors:  Frederic Picard; Angela Deakin; Navin Balasubramanian; Alberto Gregori
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 5.  Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty-do navigation or customized implants have a role?

Authors:  Matthew D Beal; Dimitri Delagramaticas; David Fitz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial.

Authors:  Peter Feczko; Lutz Engelmann; Jacobus J Arts; David Campbell
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.