Literature DB >> 25086576

Mini incision acromio-clavicular joint reconstruction using palmaris longus tendon graft.

Paritosh Gogna1, Reetadyuti Mukhopadhyay, Amanpreet Singh, Rohit Singla, Amit Batra, Narender Kumar Magu, Rohit Nara.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Conservatively managed acromio-clavicular dislocations leave the patients with significant disability. Various techniques have been described to manage such injuries operatively. However, all such techniques involve exposure of the coracoid and use of metallic implants. We present a series of eight patients managed with small incision and minimal soft tissue dissection using palmaris longus tendon graft. We treated eight patients (all males), with acute acromio-clavicular dislocation with a palmaris Longus tendon graft. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: The mean age of the patients at the time of final follow-up was 28.5 years (range 26-29 years), and the mean follow-up was 18 months (range 14-28 months). Functional assessment was done as per the DASH scores, along with a self-evaluation of the results. The vertical acromio-clavicular distance at final follow-up was compared to that at the time of presentation.
RESULTS: The mean DASH score at final follow-up was 3.01; on self-evaluation, all patients rated their result as good. The patients had no or minimal pain at final follow-up. The mean vertical acromio-clavicular distance reduced from a mean pre-operative baseline values of 10.26 ± 2-1.40 ± 0.855 mm at latest follow-up. DISCUSSION: This is a mechanically sound technique, which required a small incision and minimal soft tissue dissection. It also does not require exposure of the coracoid, thus almost ruling out chances of significant neuro-vascular injury. The patients did not require any second surgery for implant removal. However, a longer follow-up with a larger number of patients is required to evaluate its long-term results and stability of the repair.
CONCLUSION: Acromio-clavicular reconstruction using the palmaris Longus tendon graft is a simple surgery worth trying by a surgeon not proficient in arthroscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086576     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-014-0336-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  15 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular Dislocation: End-Results of Screw Suspension Treatment.

Authors:  B M Bosworth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1948-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prevalence and variance of shoulder injuries in elite collegiate football players.

Authors:  Lee D Kaplan; David C Flanigan; John Norwig; Patrick Jost; James Bradley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  J K Weaver; H K Dunn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Acute dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Traumatic anatomy and the importance of deltoid and trapezius.

Authors:  A Lizaur; L Marco; R Cebrian
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-07

5.  Modified Phemister procedure for the surgical treatment of Rockwood types III, IV, V acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  M A Verdano; A Pellegrini; M Zanelli; M Paterlini; F Ceccarelli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-08-22

6.  Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular cerclage reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Maxime Grosclaude; Anne Lübbeke; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos; Richard Stern; Thierry Rod; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Repair of complete acromioclavicular dislocation (Tossy stage III) using Balser's hook plate combined with ligament sutures.

Authors:  B Mlasowsky; P Brenner; W Düben; H Heymann
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Incidence of associated injuries with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations types III through V.

Authors:  Thomas Tischer; Gian Max Salzmann; Hosam El-Azab; Stephan Vogt; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Reconstruction of displaced acromio-clavicular joint dislocations using a triple suture-cerclage: description of a safe and efficient surgical technique.

Authors:  Gunther H Sandmann; Frank Martetschläger; Lisa Mey; Tobias M Kraus; Arne Buchholz; Philipp Ahrens; Ulrich Stöckle; Thomas Freude; Sebastian Siebenlist
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2012-10-25

10.  Mid-term outcome comparing temporary K-wire fixation versus PDS augmentation of Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Bernd A Leidel; Volker Braunstein; Susann Pilotto; Wolf Mutschler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-05-09
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Grade III Acromioclavicular Separations Treated With Suspensory Fixation Techniques: A Systematic Review of Level I Through IV Studies.

Authors:  Joseph J Ruzbarsky; Bryant P Elrick; Philip-C Nolte; Justin W Arner; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.