Literature DB >> 25086530

Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.

Audrey H Zhuang1, Arthur J Olch2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of skin dose determination for composite multibeam 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments using optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) and Eclipse treatment planning system.
METHODS: Surface doses measured by OSLDs in the buildup region for open field 6 MV beams, either perpendicular or oblique to the surface, were evaluated by comparing against dose measured by Markus Parallel Plate (PP) chamber, surface diodes, and calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. The accuracy of percent depth dose (PDD) calculation in the buildup region from the authors' Eclipse system (Version 10), which was precisely commissioned in the buildup region and was used with 1 mm calculation grid, was also evaluated by comparing to PP chamber measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Finally, an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom was CT scanned with OSLDs in place at three locations. A planning target volume (PTV) was defined that extended close to the surface. Both an 8 beam 3DCRT and IMRT plan were generated in Eclipse. OSLDs were placed at the CT scanned reference locations to measure the skin doses and were compared to diode measurements and Eclipse calculations. Efforts were made to ensure that the dose comparison was done at the effective measurement points of each detector and corresponding locations in CT images.
RESULTS: The depth of the effective measurement point is 0.8 mm for OSLD when used in the buildup region in a 6 MV beam and is 0.7 mm for the authors' surface diode. OSLDs and Eclipse system both agree well with Monte Carlo and/or Markus PP ion chamber and/or diode in buildup regions in 6 MV beams with normal or oblique incidence and across different field sizes. For the multiple beam 3DCRT plan and IMRT plans, the differences between OSLDs and Eclipse calculations on the surface of the anthropomorphic phantom were within 3% and distance-to-agreement less than 0.3 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experiment showed that OSLD is an accurate dosimeter for skin dose measurements in complex 3DCRT or IMRT plans. It also showed that an Eclipse system with accurate commissioning of the data in the buildup region and 1 mm calculation grid can calculate surface doses with high accuracy and has a potential to replace in vivo measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086530     DOI: 10.1118/1.4890795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Surface dose measurements with commonly used detectors: a consistent thickness correction method.

Authors:  Tatsiana A Reynolds; Patrick Higgins
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Technical Note: A novel dosimeter improves total skin electron therapy surface dosimetry workflow.

Authors:  Irwin I Tendler; Petr Bruza; Michael Jermyn; Jennifer Soter; Gregory Sharp; Benjamin Williams; Lesley A Jarvis; Brian Pogue; David J Gladstone
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Verification of Treatment Planning Algorithms Using Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters in a Breast Phantom.

Authors:  Zhenia Gopalakrishnan; Raghuram K Nair; P Raghukumar; Sharika V Menon; Saju Bhasi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  Dosimetric impact of placement errors in optically stimulated luminescent in vivo dosimetry in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mahin Tariq; Cindy Gomez; Adam C Riegel
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-12

5.  Effect of an integral quality monitor on 4-, 6-, 10-MV, and 6-MV flattening filter-free photon beams.

Authors:  Trang Hong Thi Nguyen; Haruna Yokoyama; Hironori Kojima; Naoki Isomura; Akihiro Takemura; Shinichi Ueda; Kimiya Noto
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Preliminary study for dose evaluation depending on dose range with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter considering individual dosimeter sensitivity.

Authors:  Su Chul Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pre-treatment visualization of predicted radiation-induced acute alopecia in brain tumour patients.

Authors:  Lieke In 't Ven; Inge Compter; Kyra van Eijsden; Jaap Zindler; Ans Swinnen; Dirk de Ruysscher; Tom Rozema; Esther G C Troost; Daniëlle B P Eekers
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14

8.  Dosimetric impact of tracheostomy devices in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Justin Lee; Sherif Ramadan; Anthony Kim; Yasir Alayed; Ananth Ravi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.