Literature DB >> 25086422

Displays of authority in the clinical consultation: a linguistic ethnographic study of the electronic patient record.

Deborah Swinglehurst1.   

Abstract

The introduction of computers into general practice settings has profoundly changed the dynamics of the clinical consultation. Previous research exploring the impact of the computer (in what has been termed the 'triadic' consultation) has shown that computer use and communication between doctor and patient are intricately coordinated and inseparable. Swinglehurst et al. have recently been critical of the ongoing tendency within health communication research to focus on 'the computer' as a relatively simple 'black box', or as a material presence in the consultation. By re-focussing on the electronic patient record (EPR) and conceptualising this as a complex collection of silent but consequential voices, they have opened up new and more nuanced possibilities for analysis. This orientation makes visible a tension between the immediate contingencies of the interaction as it unfolds moment-by-moment and the more standardised, institutional demands which are embedded in the EPR ('dilemma of attention'). In this paper I extend this work, presenting an in-depth examination of how participants in the consultation manage this tension. I used linguistic ethnographic methods to study 54 video recorded consultations from a dataset collected between 2007 and 2008 in two UK general practices, combining microanalysis of the consultation with ethnographic attention to the wider organisational and institutional context. My analysis draws on the theoretical work of Erving Goffman and Mikhail Bakhtin, incorporating attention to the 'here and now' of the interaction as well as an appreciation of the 'distributed' nature of the EPR, its role in hosting and circulating new voices, and in mediating participants' talk and social practices. It reveals - in apparently fleeting moments of negotiation and contestation - the extent to which the EPR shapes the dynamic construction, display and circulation of authority in the contemporary consultation.
Copyright © 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Authority; Electronic patient record; Health communication; Linguistic ethnography; Primary health care; UK

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086422     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  When 'yes' means 'no': why the small details of clinical interactions matter.

Authors:  Deborah Swinglehurst; Sarah Atkins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Putting the social back into sociotechnical: Case studies of co-design in digital health.

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Joseph Wherton; Sara Shaw; Clare Morrison; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Caring for the patient, caring for the record: an ethnographic study of 'back office' work in upholding quality of care in general practice.

Authors:  Deborah Swinglehurst; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Juggling confidentiality and safety: a qualitative study of how general practice clinicians document domestic violence in families with children.

Authors:  Jessica Drinkwater; Nicky Stanley; Eszter Szilassy; Cath Larkins; Marianne Hester; Gene Feder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  "Violence" in medicine: necessary and unnecessary, intentional and unintentional.

Authors:  Johanna Shapiro
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.464

6.  Defining compassion in the digital health age: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  David Wiljer; Rebecca Charow; Helen Costin; Lydia Sequeira; Melanie Anderson; Gillian Strudwick; Tim Tripp; Allison Crawford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Caring for quality of care: symbolic violence and the bureaucracies of audit.

Authors:  Nathan Emmerich; Deborah Swinglehurst; Jo Maybin; Sophie Park; Sally Quilligan
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.