W Asher Wolf1, Cary C Cotton2, Daniel J Green2, Julia T Hughes2, John T Woosley3, Nicholas J Shaheen1, Evan S Dellon4. 1. Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 4. Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: edellon@med.unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is commonly treated with swallowed (topical) corticosteroids (tCS). However, few factors have been described that predict outcomes of steroid therapy. We aimed to identify factors associated with nonresponse to tCS and report outcomes of second-line treatment for patients with steroid-refractory EoE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study by using the University of North Carolina EoE Clinicopathologic Database to identify patients who received tCS for EoE from 2006 through 2013. Demographic, symptom, endoscopic, and histologic data were extracted from medical records. Immunohistochemistry was performed on archived biopsies. Responders and nonresponders to tCS were compared. RESULTS: Of 221 patients with EoE who received tCS, 71% had endoscopic improvement, 79% had symptomatic improvement, and 57% had histologic response (<15 eosinophils/high-power field). After multivariate logistic regression, esophageal dilation at the baseline examination predicted nonresponse (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.3), and abdominal pain predicted response (odds ratio for nonresponse, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.83); no other clinical features were predictive. On the basis of immunohistochemical analysis, higher baseline levels of tryptase (244 vs 157 mast cells/mm(2), P = .04) and eotaxin-3 (2425 vs 239 cells/mm(2), P = .02) were associated with steroid response, but levels of major basic protein were not. Among 27 steroid-refractory patients, a mean of 2 additional therapies were tried; only 48% of the patients eventually responded to any second-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a retrospective analysis of a large group of patients with EoE, only 57% have a histologic response to steroid therapy. Baseline esophageal dilation and decreased levels of mast cells and eotaxin-3 predicted which patients would not respond to therapy. Combining clinical factors and immunohistochemistry might therefore be used to direct therapy.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is commonly treated with swallowed (topical) corticosteroids (tCS). However, few factors have been described that predict outcomes of steroid therapy. We aimed to identify factors associated with nonresponse to tCS and report outcomes of second-line treatment for patients with steroid-refractory EoE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study by using the University of North Carolina EoE Clinicopathologic Database to identify patients who received tCS for EoE from 2006 through 2013. Demographic, symptom, endoscopic, and histologic data were extracted from medical records. Immunohistochemistry was performed on archived biopsies. Responders and nonresponders to tCS were compared. RESULTS: Of 221 patients with EoE who received tCS, 71% had endoscopic improvement, 79% had symptomatic improvement, and 57% had histologic response (<15 eosinophils/high-power field). After multivariate logistic regression, esophageal dilation at the baseline examination predicted nonresponse (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-6.3), and abdominal pain predicted response (odds ratio for nonresponse, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.83); no other clinical features were predictive. On the basis of immunohistochemical analysis, higher baseline levels of tryptase (244 vs 157 mast cells/mm(2), P = .04) and eotaxin-3 (2425 vs 239 cells/mm(2), P = .02) were associated with steroid response, but levels of major basic protein were not. Among 27 steroid-refractory patients, a mean of 2 additional therapies were tried; only 48% of the patients eventually responded to any second-line therapy. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a retrospective analysis of a large group of patients with EoE, only 57% have a histologic response to steroid therapy. Baseline esophageal dilation and decreased levels of mast cells and eotaxin-3 predicted which patients would not respond to therapy. Combining clinical factors and immunohistochemistry might therefore be used to direct therapy.
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Xiaoxin Chen; C Ryan Miller; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Hannah P Kim; Sarah L W Sperry; David A Rybnicek; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-11-23 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Jeffrey A Alexander; Kee Wook Jung; Amindra S Arora; Felicity Enders; David A Katzka; Gail M Kephardt; Hirohito Kita; Lori A Kryzer; Yvonne Romero; Thomas C Smyrk; Nicholas J Talley Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: W Asher Wolf; Maya R Jerath; Sarah L W Sperry; Nicholas J Shaheen; Evan S Dellon Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Nirmala Gonsalves; Ikuo Hirano; Glenn T Furuta; Chris A Liacouras; David A Katzka Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Arif Sheikh; Olga Speck; Kimberly Woodward; Ann B Whitlow; Jessica M Hores; Marija Ivanovic; Allen Chau; John T Woosley; Ryan D Madanick; Roy C Orlando; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Swathi Eluri; Sara R Selitsky; Irina Perjar; Johnathan Hollyfield; Renee Betancourt; Cara Randall; Spencer Rusin; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen; Evan S Dellon Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Thomas M Runge; Swathi Eluri; Cary C Cotton; Caitlin M Burk; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen; Evan S Dellon Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Cary C Cotton; Daniel Erim; Swathi Eluri; Sarah H Palmer; Daniel J Green; W Asher Wolf; Thomas M Runge; Stephanie Wheeler; Nicholas J Shaheen; Evan S Dellon Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 11.382