Literature DB >> 25085902

Modulation of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor response and DNA recombination in breast cancer cells by drugs affecting endogenous wild-type p53.

Ivanildce Cristiane Ireno1, Rahel Stephanie Wiehe1, Andreea Iulia Stahl2, Stephanie Hampp2, Sevtap Aydin3, Melissa A Troester4, Galina Selivanova5, Lisa Wiesmüller1.   

Abstract

Synthetic lethal interactions between poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and homologous recombination (HR) repair pathways have been exploited for the development of novel mono- and combination cancer therapies. The tumor suppressor p53 was demonstrated to exhibit indirect and direct regulatory activities in DNA repair, particularly in DNA double-strand break (DSB)-induced and replication-associated HR. In this study, we tested a potential influence of the p53 status on the response to PARP inhibition, which is known to cause replication stress. Silencing endogenous or inducibly expressing p53 we found a protective effect of p53 on PARP inhibitor (PARPi)-mediated cytotoxicities. This effect was specific for wild-type versus mutant p53 and observed in cancer but not in non-transformed cell lines. Enhanced cytotoxicities after treatment with the p53-inhibitory drug Pifithrinα further supported p53-mediated resistance to PARP inhibition. Surprisingly, we equally observed increased PARPi sensitivity in the presence of the p53-activating compound Nutlin-3. As a common denominator, both drug responses correlated with decreased HR activities: Pifithrinα downregulated spontaneous HR resulting in damage accumulation. Nutlin-3 induced a decrease of DSB-induced HR, which was accompanied by a severe drop in RAD51 protein levels. Thus, we revealed a novel link between PARPi responsiveness and p53-controlled HR activities. These data expand the concept of cell and stress type-dependent healer and killer functions of wild-type p53 in response to cancer therapeutic treatment. Our findings have implications for the individualized design of cancer therapies using PARPi and the potentially combined use of p53-modulatory drugs.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25085902     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgu160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  19 in total

1.  NF-κB-dependent DNA damage-signaling differentially regulates DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms in immature and mature human hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  D Kraft; M Rall; M Volcic; E Metzler; A Groo; A Stahl; L Bauer; E Nasonova; D Salles; G Taucher-Scholz; H Bönig; C Fournier; L Wiesmüller
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  DNA damage tolerance pathway involving DNA polymerase ι and the tumor suppressor p53 regulates DNA replication fork progression.

Authors:  Stephanie Hampp; Tina Kiessling; Kerstin Buechle; Sabrina F Mansilla; Jürgen Thomale; Melanie Rall; Jinwoo Ahn; Helmut Pospiech; Vanesa Gottifredi; Lisa Wiesmüller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Unscheduled MRE11 activity triggers cell death but not chromosome instability in polymerase eta-depleted cells subjected to UV irradiation.

Authors:  Sebastián Omar Siri; Nicolás Luis Calzetta; María Belén Federico; Natalia Soledad Paviolo; María Belén de la Vega; Julieta Martino; María Carolina Campana; Lisa Wiesmüller; Vanesa Gottifredi
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Cisplatin in Combination with MDM2 Inhibition Downregulates Rad51 Recombinase in a Bimodal Manner to Inhibit Homologous Recombination and Augment Tumor Cell Kill.

Authors:  Xiaolei Xie; Guangan He; Zahid H Siddik
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 4.436

5.  Efficacy of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib against head and neck cancer cells: Predictions of drug sensitivity based on PAR-p53-NF-κB interactions.

Authors:  Minsu Kwon; Hyejin Jang; Eun Hye Kim; Jong-Lyel Roh
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Predictors and Modulators of Synthetic Lethality: An Update on PARP Inhibitors and Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Stephen Murata; Catherine Zhang; Nathan Finch; Kevin Zhang; Loredana Campo; Eun-Kyoung Breuer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Increased single-strand annealing rather than non-homologous end-joining predicts hereditary ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Miriam Deniz; Tatiana Romashova; Sarah Kostezka; Anke Faul; Theresa Gundelach; Maria Moreno-Villanueva; Wolfgang Janni; Thomas W P Friedl; Lisa Wiesmüller
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-09

8.  PARP-Targeted Auger Therapy in p53 Mutant Colon Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models.

Authors:  Thomas Wilson; Giacomo Pirovano; Gu Xiao; Zachary Samuels; Sheryl Roberts; Tara Viray; Navjot Guru; Pat Zanzonico; Marc Gollub; Naga Vara Kishore Pillarsetty; Thomas Reiner; Jill Bargonetti
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Heterozygous PALB2 c.1592delT mutation channels DNA double-strand break repair into error-prone pathways in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  K Obermeier; J Sachsenweger; T W P Friedl; H Pospiech; R Winqvist; L Wiesmüller
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  The C-terminal domain of p53 orchestrates the interplay between non-covalent and covalent poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of p53 by PARP1.

Authors:  Arthur Fischbach; Annika Krüger; Stephanie Hampp; Greta Assmann; Lisa Rank; Matthias Hufnagel; Martin T Stöckl; Jan M F Fischer; Sebastian Veith; Pascal Rossatti; Magdalena Ganz; Elisa Ferrando-May; Andrea Hartwig; Karin Hauser; Lisa Wiesmüller; Alexander Bürkle; Aswin Mangerich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.