Literature DB >> 2508586

Evaluation of intravenous ciprofloxacin in patients with nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections. Impact of plasma concentrations, organism, minimum inhibitory concentration, and clinical condition on bacterial eradication.

C A Peloquin1, T J Cumbo, D E Nix, M F Sands, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Fifty patients with gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections were treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin to evaluate efficacy and safety. Relationships between individual pharmacokinetics and clinical and bacteriologic outcome were studied. Ciprofloxacin concentrations in plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Respiratory secretion cultures were obtained daily to determine the eradication day of the infecting organism. Susceptibility (minimum inhibitory concentration) to ciprofloxacin and other antimicrobials was determined using standard microdilution techniques. The mean age of the patients was 70 years. They had multiple underlying diseases, and two thirds of them were ventilator dependent at entry. Approximately 50% of the patients had failed previous treatment for the same infections. Patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae or Haemophilus influenzae with minimum inhibitory concentrations of less than 0.25 mg/L responded well to intravenous ciprofloxacin therapy (200 mg every 12 hours). The organisms were eradicated from sputum cultures usually within 1 day after ciprofloxacin therapy was started. Most clinical failures occurred in patients who were infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and had multiple underlying diseases. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from 10 patients with pneumonia, 2 patients with lung abscess, and 1 patient with bronchiectasis. The Pseudomonas isolate acquired resistance during ciprofloxacin treatment in 7 patients with pneumonia and in all of the remaining 3 patients. We conclude that ciprofloxacin is safe and effective at a dosage of 200 mg administered intravenously every 12 hours for nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae or Haemophilus species. Many patients who had failed previous antibiotic treatment for Enterobacteriaceae infections had good clinical response to ciprofloxacin therapy. Studies using either higher dosages of ciprofloxacin or combination therapy should be conducted to determine if acquired resistance can be avoided in Pseudomonas infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  51 in total

1.  In vitro activity of moxifloxacin against bacteria isolated from odontogenic abscesses.

Authors:  Ingo Sobottka; Georg Cachovan; Enno Stürenburg; M Oliver Ahlers; Rainer Laufs; Ursula Platzer; Dietrich Mack
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy.

Authors:  Nelson Jumbe; Arnold Louie; Robert Leary; Weiguo Liu; Mark R Deziel; Vincent H Tam; Reetu Bachhawat; Christopher Freeman; James B Kahn; Karen Bush; Michael N Dudley; Michael H Miller; George L Drusano
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  The combination of meropenem and levofloxacin is synergistic with respect to both Pseudomonas aeruginosa kill rate and resistance suppression.

Authors:  Arnold Louie; Caroline Grasso; Nadzeya Bahniuk; Brian Van Scoy; David L Brown; Robert Kulawy; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Resistance emergence mechanism and mechanism of resistance suppression by tobramycin for cefepime for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Robert A Bonomo; Nadzeya Bahniuk; Juergen B Bulitta; Brian Vanscoy; Holland Defiglio; Steven Fikes; David Brown; Sarah M Drawz; Robert Kulawy; Arnold Louie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy evaluation in empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Kristina Öbrink-Hansen; Tore Forsingdal Hardlei; Birgitte Brock; Søren Jensen-Fangel; Marianne Kragh Thomsen; Eskild Petersen; Mads Kreilgaard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparative serum bactericidal activities of three doses of ciprofloxacin administered intravenously.

Authors:  M Dan; F Poch; C Quassem; R Kitzes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Penetration of ciprofloxacin into bronchial secretions from mechanically ventilated patients with nosocomial bronchopneumonia.

Authors:  P Saux; C Martin; M N Mallet; L Papazian; B Bruguerolle; P De Micco; F Gouin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Ciprofloxacin in polyethylene glycol-coated liposomes: efficacy in rat models of acute or chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Authors:  Irma A J M Bakker-Woudenberg; Marian T ten Kate; Luke Guo; Peter Working; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Ciprofloxacin. A review of its pharmacological profile and therapeutic use in the elderly.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Disposition kinetics of difloxacin in rabbit after intravenous and intramuscular injection of Dicural.

Authors:  A M Abd El-Aty; A Goudah; M Ismail; M Shimoda
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.459

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.