Literature DB >> 25085552

What are pregnant women told about models of maternity care in Australia? A retrospective study of women's reports.

Gabrielle Stevens1, Rachel Thompson2, Sue Kruske3, Bernadette Watson3, Yvette D Miller4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe women's reports of the model of care options General Practitioners (GPs) discussed with them at the first pregnancy consultation and women's self-reported role in decision-making about model of care.
METHODS: Women who had recently given birth responded to survey items about the models of care GPs discussed, their role in final decision-making, and socio-demographic, obstetric history, and early pregnancy characteristics.
RESULTS: The proportion of women with whom each model of care was discussed varied between 8.2% (for private midwifery care with home birth) and 64.4% (GP shared care). Only 7.7% of women reported that all seven models were discussed. Exclusive discussion about private obstetric care and about all public models was common, and women's health insurance status was the strongest predictor of the presence of discussions about each model. Most women (82.6%) reported active involvement in final decision-making about model of care.
CONCLUSION: Although most women report involvement in maternity model of care decisions, they remain largely uninformed about the breadth of available model of care options. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Strategies that facilitate women's access to information on the differentiating features and outcomes for all models of care should be prioritized to better ensure equitable and quality decisions.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision support; Information provision; Informed decision-making; Maternity care; Models of care; Patient participation; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25085552     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  5 in total

1.  Perceived Safety, Quality and Cultural Competency of Maternity Care for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women in Queensland.

Authors:  Sarah Mander; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-05-16

2.  A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Jessica Tone; Sutapa Talukdar; Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Ingrid Mogren; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Rhonda Small
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Women's experience of intrapartum transfer from a Western Australian birth centre co-located to a tertiary maternity hospital.

Authors:  Lesley Kuliukas; Ravani Duggan; Lucy Lewis; Yvonne Hauck
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Factors promoting or inhibiting normal birth.

Authors:  Samantha J Prosser; Adrian G Barnett; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.