Literature DB >> 25085227

[Simplified topical anesthesia protocol for ambulatory cataract surgery: safety and patient and surgeon satisfaction].

B Batta1, T Fuchs-Buder2, F Tréchot1, K Angioi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF STUDY: The purpose of our study was to assess safety and efficacy of cataract surgery (CS) under topical anesthesia alone, i.e. without pre-anesthetic evaluation and without direct presence of an anesthesiologist. To this end we assessed the incidence of patients' preoperative anxiety, perioperative adverse events and patients' and surgeons' satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing CS under topical anesthesia over a one-month period were included. An anesthesiologist and nurse anesthetist were present in the area and could intervene in case of an adverse event. Patients' anxiety was scored using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety & Information Scale (APAIS), and their satisfaction with the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS). Surgeons' satisfaction was scored with a VAS from 0 to 10 (0: surgery not possible & 10: excellent surgical conditions). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients were included; mean age was 71 (±9.4) years. Mean APAIS I was 6.4/20 (±3.7). Mean APAIS II was 3.1 (±1.8). Mean ISAS score was 5.5/6 (±0.6), indicating high patient satisfaction. Surgeon satisfaction score was 8.9/10 (±1.7). Twenty-three adverse events occurred of which 16 required interventions by the anaesthesiologist or surgeon: 5 supplemental local or regional anaesthesia, 6 iv-analgesia, 5 management of hypertension.
CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that a simplified topical anesthesia protocol for ambulatory CS appears to be feasible and safe, as long as an anesthesia team is present in the area to intervene if needed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia preoperative evaluation; Anesthésie topique; Cataract surgery; Cataracte; Consultation d’anesthésie; Topical anesthesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25085227     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol        ISSN: 0181-5512            Impact factor:   0.818


  2 in total

1.  Why surgeons need to know about anaesthesia.

Authors:  Jacob Rosenberg; Thomas Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cauterisation versus fibrin glue for conjunctival autografting in primary pterygium surgery (CAGE CUP): study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mladen Lešin; Martina Paradžik; Josipa Marin Lovrić; Ivana Olujić; Žana Ljubić; Ana Vučinović; Kajo Bućan; Livia Puljak
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.