Literature DB >> 25085041

Adverse reactions to contrast media: an analysis of spontaneous reports in the database of the pharmacovigilance programme of India.

Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan1, Surbhi Sharma, Gyanendra Nath Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast media are used widely to improve medical imaging. Like all other pharmaceuticals, these agents are not completely devoid of risk, and continuous monitoring of adverse reactions with these agents is important. Spontaneous reporting is the simplest method for understanding the safety profile of pharmaceutical products after their approval.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the pattern and characteristics of adverse reactions attributed to contrast media in the Indian population reported to the National Coordination Centre for the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (NCC-PvPI).
METHODS: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) attributed to contrast media submitted spontaneously to the NCC-PvPI were extracted from the database for July 2010 to September 2013. We analysed these reports for information related to reporter's professional category, patient's age and sex, reporter's diagnosis of the reaction, seriousness of the reaction, type of contrast media exposure, system organ class (SOC) affected (as described in World Health Organization Adverse Reaction Terminology [WHO-ART]) and outcome.
RESULTS: Of the total 59,915 ICSRs in the database, 415 (0.7%) were suspected adverse reactions to contrast media; 44 reports were serious, including three fatal cases. The most affected SOCs were skin and appendage disorders, body as a whole-general disorders, gastrointestinal system disorders and respiratory system disorders. Hypersensitivity reactions were reported in the majority of ICSRs. The contrast media with the highest number of reports were iohexol (40.7%), iomeprol (17.8%), iopamidol (12%) and diatrizoate (12%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the reactions to contrast media were allergic-like, and no previously unrecognised adverse reactions were observed in the Indian population. Further data and increased awareness among healthcare professionals is required to signal and prevent the consequences of adverse reactions attributed to contrast media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25085041     DOI: 10.1007/s40264-014-0202-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  22 in total

Review 1.  Anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions. Classification and pathophysiology.

Authors:  J Ring; H Behrendt
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Drug-induced anaphylaxis : case/non-case study based on an italian pharmacovigilance database.

Authors:  Roberto Leone; Anita Conforti; Mauro Venegoni; Domenico Motola; Ugo Moretti; Ilaria Meneghelli; Alfredo Cocci; Giulia Sangiorgi Cellini; Stefania Scotto; Nicola Montanaro; Giampaolo Velo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Management of hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  K Brockow; C Christiansen; G Kanny; O Clément; A Barbaud; A Bircher; P Dewachter; J-L Guéant; R-M Rodriguez Guéant; C Mouton-Faivre; J Ring; A Romano; J Sainte-Laudy; P Demoly; W J Pichler
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 13.146

4.  Deaths related to iodinated contrast media reported spontaneously to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1978-1994: effect of the availability of low-osmolality contrast media.

Authors:  D B Spring; M A Bettmann; H E Barkan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.

Authors:  H Katayama; K Yamaguchi; T Kozuka; T Takashima; P Seez; K Matsuura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Anaphylactoid and anaphylactic reactions to iodinated contrast material.

Authors:  D Laroche; F Namour; C Lefrançois; I Aimone-Gastin; A Romano; J Sainte-Laudy; M C Laxenaire; J L Guéant
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.146

7.  The current status of reactions to intravenous contrast media.

Authors:  G Ansell; M C Tweedie; C R West; P Evans; L Couch
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Contrast media hypersensitivity--scope of the problem.

Authors:  Knut Brockow
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.

Authors:  S T Cochran; K Bomyea; J W Sayre
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Adverse reactions to contrast media: an analysis from spontaneous reporting data.

Authors:  Paola Cutroneo; Giovanni Polimeni; Roberto Curcuruto; Gioacchino Calapai; Achille P Caputi
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 7.658

View more
  8 in total

1.  Medicine Safety Monitoring in Pediatric Population in India.

Authors:  Ismeet Kaur; Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan; Gyanendra N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Contrast Media Adverse Drug Reactions in Highly Polluted Environment.

Authors:  Natalia Sauer; Wojciech Szlasa; Laura Jonderko; Krystyna Głowacka; Katarzyna Karłowicz-Bodalska; Anna Wiela-Hojeńska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Status of documentation grading and completeness score for Indian individual case safety reports.

Authors:  Kalaiselvan Vivekanandan; Kumar Rishi; Thota Prasad; Tripathi Arunabh; G N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.200

Review 4.  Pharmacovigilance Programme of India: Recent developments and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan; Prasad Thota; Gyanendra Nath Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.200

5.  Veterinary pharmacovigilance in India: A need of hour.

Authors:  Rishi Kumar; Vivekanandan Kalaiselvan; Ravendra Verma; Ismeet Kaur; Pranay Kumar; G N Singh
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.200

6.  An analysis of completeness and quality of adverse drug reaction reports at an adverse drug reaction monitoring centre in Western India.

Authors:  Manali Mangesh Mahajan; Urmila Mukund Thatte; Nithya Jaideep Gogtay; Siddharth Deshpande
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

7.  Fatal contrast medium-induced adverse response to iohexol in carotid artery angioplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Zhiqi Yang; Rong Li; Jinbin Yue; Yaxuan Wei; Xiaoyan Zhang; Rong Yin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  An update on the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India.

Authors:  Ratan J Lihite; Mangala Lahkar
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.