Literature DB >> 25084776

Quality control by photo documentation for evaluation of laparoscopic and open colectomy with D3 resection for stage II/III colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.

Kentaro Nakajima1, Masafumi Inomata2, Tomonori Akagi1, Tsuyoshi Etoh1, Kenichi Sugihara3, Masahiko Watanabe4, Seiichiro Yamamoto5, Hiroshi Katayama6, Yoshihiro Moriya5, Seigo Kitano7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The quality of surgery with D3 resection in randomized controlled clinical trial [Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG0404)] was assessed by evaluation of the photo documentation of both open and laparoscopic surgeries.
METHODS: A multi-institutional randomized-controlled trial (JCOG0404) was conducted to evaluate open and laparoscopic D3 resection (complete mesocolic excision + ligation and dissection at the root of the main vessels) for Stage II/III colon cancer (UMIN-CTR number C000000105). A total of 1057 (open, 528; laparoscopic, 529) eligible patients were enrolled. For quality control, it was ensured that the surgeries were performed by accredited surgeons, and a central committee reviewed each surgery on the basis of the submitted photographs of the resected field, specimen and skin incision.
RESULTS: For right-sided tumors, the rate of D3 resection was 98.5% (131/133) in the open arm and 100% (136/136) in the laparoscopic arm, and for left-sided tumors, they were 97.9% (322/329) and 98.2% (320/326), respectively. Sufficient length of the resected longitudinal margin was ensured in all cases. The skin incisions made in all the cases were <8 cm as defined in the protocol in laparoscopic arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Completion of high quality surgery with D3 resection was confirmed in JCOG0404 by central peer review of photographs of the surgical procedures in addition to operator regulations. This study suggests that the central review of the photo documentation is one of the important tools to assure a quality control of surgical technique in the Phase III randomized-controlled study.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; laparoscopy; photograph; quality control; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25084776     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyu083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

1.  A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901).

Authors:  Noriyuki Inaki; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Tetsuji Ohyama; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Natsuya Katada; Keisuke Koeda; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Akinori Takagane; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Ongoing clinical studies of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Etoh; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-11

3.  Comparative benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a case-matched comparison of short- and long-term outcomes with middle-aged patients.

Authors:  Koki Otsuka; Toshimoto Kimura; Masanori Hakozaki; Mizunori Yaegashi; Teppei Matsuo; Hitoshi Fujii; Kei Sato; Tomoki Hatanaka; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Comprehensive literature review of randomized clinical trials examining novel treatment advances in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  William Paul Skelton; Aaron J Franke; Atif Iqbal; Thomas J George
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-08

Review 5.  Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe S Sica; Danilo Vinci; Leandro Siragusa; Bruno Sensi; Andrea M Guida; Vittoria Bellato; Álvaro García-Granero; Gianluca Pellino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 6.  Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gouvas; Christos Agalianos; Kleio Papaparaskeva; Aristotelis Perrakis; Werner Hohenberger; Evaghelos Xynos
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it?

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Ker-Kan Tan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12

Review 8.  Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrew Emmanuel; Amyn Haji
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ionut Negoi; Sorin Hostiuc; Ruxandra Irina Negoi; Mircea Beuran
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-12-15

10.  Risk factors for early postoperative complications after D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer: Supplementary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan (JCOG0404).

Authors:  Yusuke Nishizawa; Tomonori Akagi; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroshi Katayama; Junki Mizusawa; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masaaki Ito; Tadahiko Masaki; Masahiko Watanabe; Yasuhiro Shimada; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.