Literature DB >> 25083742

Computer-aided nanotoxicology: assessing cytotoxicity of nanoparticles under diverse experimental conditions by using a novel QSTR-perturbation approach.

Feng Luan1, Valeria V Kleandrova, Humberto González-Díaz, Juan M Ruso, André Melo, Alejandro Speck-Planche, M Natália D S Cordeiro.   

Abstract

Nowadays, the interest in the search for new nanomaterials with improved electrical, optical, catalytic and biological properties has increased. Despite the potential benefits that can be gathered from the use of nanoparticles, only little attention has been paid to their possible toxic effects that may affect human health. In this context, several assays have been carried out to evaluate the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Owing to the cost in both resources and time involved in such toxicological assays, there has been a considerable increase in the interest towards alternative computational methods, like the application of quantitative structure-activity/toxicity relationship (QSAR/QSTR) models for risk assessment of nanoparticles. However, most QSAR/QSTR models developed so far have predicted cytotoxicity against only one cell line, and they did not provide information regarding the influence of important factors rather than composition or size. This work reports a QSTR-perturbation model aiming at simultaneously predicting the cytotoxicity of different nanoparticles against several mammalian cell lines, and also considering different times of exposure of the cell lines, as well as the chemical composition of nanoparticles, size, conditions under which the size was measured, and shape. The derived QSTR-perturbation model, using a dataset of 1681 cases (nanoparticle-nanoparticle pairs), exhibited an accuracy higher than 93% for both training and prediction sets. In order to demonstrate the practical applicability of our model, the cytotoxicity of different silica (SiO2), nickel (Ni), and nickel(ii) oxide (NiO) nanoparticles were predicted and found to be in very good agreement with experimental reports. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to simultaneously predict the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles under multiple experimental conditions by applying a single unique QSTR model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25083742     DOI: 10.1039/c4nr01285b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  19 in total

1.  Computer-aided design of carbon nanotubes with the desired bioactivity and safety profiles.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Dongqiuye Pu; Liwen Li; Hongyu Zhou; Qingxin Mu; Gaoxing Su; Bing Yan; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Computational and Experimental Approaches to Investigate Lipid Nanoparticles as Drug and Gene Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Chun Chan; Shi Du; Yizhou Dong; Xiaolin Cheng
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Chiral Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Enantioselective α-Amidoalkylation Reactions: A Joint Experimental and Predictive Study.

Authors:  Eider Aranzamendi; Sonia Arrasate; Nuria Sotomayor; Humberto González-Díaz; Esther Lete
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.911

Review 4.  Current Knowledge on the Use of Computational Toxicology in Hazard Assessment of Metallic Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Guangchao Chen; Willie Peijnenburg; Yinlong Xiao; Martina G Vijver
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Experimental Study and ANN Dual-Time Scale Perturbation Model of Electrokinetic Properties of Microbiota.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Cristian R Munteanu; Carlos Fernandez-Lozano; Alejandro Pazos; Tao Ran; Zhiliang Tan; Yizun Yu; Chuanshe Zhou; Shaoxun Tang; Humberto González-Díaz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Metal Oxide Nanomaterial QNAR Models: Available Structural Descriptors and Understanding of Toxicity Mechanisms.

Authors:  Jiali Ying; Ting Zhang; Meng Tang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  An ISA-TAB-Nano based data collection framework to support data-driven modelling of nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Richard L Marchese Robinson; Mark T D Cronin; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Robert Rallo
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.649

8.  Gastrointestinal Spatiotemporal mRNA Expression of Ghrelin vs Growth Hormone Receptor and New Growth Yield Machine Learning Model Based on Perturbation Theory.

Authors:  Tao Ran; Yong Liu; Hengzhi Li; Shaoxun Tang; Zhixiong He; Cristian R Munteanu; Humberto González-Díaz; Zhiliang Tan; Chuanshe Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Mechanism-based QSTR Model for Acute to Chronic Toxicity Extrapolation: A Case Study of Antibiotics on Luminous Bacteria.

Authors:  Dali Wang; Yue Gu; Min Zheng; Wei Zhang; Zhifen Lin; Ying Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  A Review of Recent Advances towards the Development of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships for Metallic Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Guangchao Chen; Martina G Vijver; Yinlong Xiao; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.