Ryan Li1, Claudia Cooper2, Julie Barber3, Penny Rapaport2, Mark Griffin4, Gill Livingston2. 1. Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK. Electronic address: ryan.li@nice.org.uk. 2. Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK. 3. Department of Statistical Science, University College London, UK. 4. Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family carers of people with dementia frequently become depressed or anxious. In observational studies, more emotion-focused and less dysfunctional coping predict fewer psychological symptoms, but no randomised controlled trial (RCT) has directly investigated emotion-focused coping as mediator of effectiveness of a successful psychological intervention. We hypothesised that emotion-focused coping would mediate the START psychological intervention׳s effects in an RCT. We tested whether mediated effects were moderated by severity of baseline symptoms. METHODS: 260 family carers from NHS dementia services were randomised to START (manualised coping skills intervention), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Blinded raters administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-T) and Brief COPE inventory at baseline, 4 and 8 months. HADS-T improved in the intervention group when compared to TAU at all levels of psychological distress. We tested whether coping was a mediator and for moderated mediation, and (post-hoc) subgroup treatment effects on coping. RESULTS: Data were available for 187 carers (71.9%) for the mediation analysis. The reduced HADS-T score in the intervention group was mediated by increased emotion-focused coping only among carers with higher (16+) baseline HADS-T scores (mediated effect=-0.63 [-1.11, -0.15]; proportion of overall effect=33% [3%, 64%]). LIMITATIONS: We did not measure plausible psychosocial treatment mechanisms other than coping. CONCLUSIONS: START benefited family carers both in preventing and treating psychological morbidity, through different mechanisms of action. The most psychologically distressed carers increased their emotion-focused coping and did not decrease their dysfunctional coping, while others benefited but not through this mechanism.
BACKGROUND: Family carers of people with dementia frequently become depressed or anxious. In observational studies, more emotion-focused and less dysfunctional coping predict fewer psychological symptoms, but no randomised controlled trial (RCT) has directly investigated emotion-focused coping as mediator of effectiveness of a successful psychological intervention. We hypothesised that emotion-focused coping would mediate the START psychological intervention׳s effects in an RCT. We tested whether mediated effects were moderated by severity of baseline symptoms. METHODS: 260 family carers from NHS dementia services were randomised to START (manualised coping skills intervention), or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Blinded raters administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-T) and Brief COPE inventory at baseline, 4 and 8 months. HADS-T improved in the intervention group when compared to TAU at all levels of psychological distress. We tested whether coping was a mediator and for moderated mediation, and (post-hoc) subgroup treatment effects on coping. RESULTS: Data were available for 187 carers (71.9%) for the mediation analysis. The reduced HADS-T score in the intervention group was mediated by increased emotion-focused coping only among carers with higher (16+) baseline HADS-T scores (mediated effect=-0.63 [-1.11, -0.15]; proportion of overall effect=33% [3%, 64%]). LIMITATIONS: We did not measure plausible psychosocial treatment mechanisms other than coping. CONCLUSIONS: START benefited family carers both in preventing and treating psychological morbidity, through different mechanisms of action. The most psychologically distressed carers increased their emotion-focused coping and did not decrease their dysfunctional coping, while others benefited but not through this mechanism.
Authors: Herman H M Lo; Alma Au; W V Cho; Elsa N S Lau; Janet Y H Wong; Samuel Y S Wong; Jerf W K Yeung Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Roland von Känel; Paul J Mills; Joel E Dimsdale; Michael G Ziegler; Matthew A Allison; Thomas L Patterson; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Christopher Pruitt; Igor Grant; Brent T Mausbach Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jamie M Jacobs; Ashley M Nelson; Lara Traeger; Lauren Waldman; Showly Nicholson; Annemarie D Jagielo; Jennifer D'Alotto; Joseph A Greer; Jennifer S Temel; Areej El-Jawahri Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 6.860