OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety between Mammotome vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (Mammotome VABB) and conventional open excision for benign breast tumor. METHODS: A computer-based online search of Medline, PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wanfang, CNKI and Chinese Biological Medicine Database was performed, and conference references were manually searched. With the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, all randomized controlled trials comparing mammotome minimally invasive operation and conventional open excision were systematically reviewed. The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies involving 5,256 patients was included. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in the size of tumor, postoperative hematomas, ecchymosis, ecchymoma and residual disease between Mammotome VABB and conventional open excision. Mammotome VABB was superior to open excision as to the size of incision, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, healing time, size of scar, wound infection and breast deformation. CONCLUSIONS: Mammotome VABB is an ideal method for benign breast tumor.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety between Mammotome vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (Mammotome VABB) and conventional open excision for benign breast tumor. METHODS: A computer-based online search of Medline, PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, VIP, Wanfang, CNKI and Chinese Biological Medicine Database was performed, and conference references were manually searched. With the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, all randomized controlled trials comparing mammotome minimally invasive operation and conventional open excision were systematically reviewed. The Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies involving 5,256 patients was included. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in the size of tumor, postoperative hematomas, ecchymosis, ecchymoma and residual disease between Mammotome VABB and conventional open excision. Mammotome VABB was superior to open excision as to the size of incision, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, healing time, size of scar, wound infection and breast deformation. CONCLUSIONS: Mammotome VABB is an ideal method for benign breast tumor.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mammotome vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (Mammotome VABB); Meta analysis; benign tumor; breast; surgery
Authors: R E Fine; P Z Israel; L C Walker; K R Corgan; L V Greenwald; J E Berenson; B A Boyd; M K Oliver; T McClure; J Elberfeld Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Enrico Cassano; Linei A B D Urban; Maria Pizzamiglio; Francesca Abbate; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Giuseppe Viale; Massimo Bellomi Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Richard E Fine; Beth A Boyd; Pat W Whitworth; Julian A Kim; Jay K Harness; William E Burak Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: R Plantade; J C Hammou; F Gerard; I Chanalet; D Aubanel; M David-Bureau; A Scotto; M Fighiera; S Gueret; L Lo Monaco Journal: J Radiol Date: 2005-09
Authors: Raffaele Costantini; Augusto Sardellone; Cristiana Marino; Maria Adele Giamberardino; Paolo Innocenti; Antonio Maria Napolitano Journal: Tumori Date: 2005 Jul-Aug
Authors: Juan de D Berná-Serna; Florentina Guzmán-Aroca; Juan de D Berná-Mestre; Dolores Hernández-Gómez Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Juan Pablo Salazar; Ignacio Miranda; Juan de Torres; María N Rus; Martin Espinosa-Bravo; Antonio Esgueva; Rafael Salvador; Isabel T Rubio Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Florentina Guzmán-Aroca; Juan de Dios Berná-Serna; Ana Azahara García-Ortega; Dolores Hernández-Gómez; Juan de Dios Berná-Mestre Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 4.241